Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
> increased thermal efficiency [...] 45-50 percent, compared to 30 percent for typical four-stroke engines
https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/porsche-6-stroke-engine-innovation
I'm gonna guestimate that today's direct injection 4-stroke is a bit above 30 percent, maybe even very close to 35%; my 2010s subcompact gets ~20% better mpg than my 1990s hatchwagen while both are the same weight. But even so, from 35% to 45%+ is a big difference.
So, re Porsche 6-stroke, for anyone who may be following this closely and can answer, is the first power stroke a sort of super lean burn while the second power stroke injects additional fuel for the left over combustion to get extra power and clean up emissions, particularly nitrogen oxides? (Is so they one upped Honda, which really had an edge of the other auto makers with their lean burn tech.)
https://www.motortrend.com/features/might-new-concept-rotary-range-extender-fly-technologue/
https://newatlas.com/technology/h2starfire-rotary-engine/