Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It would be a lot more than a slight tweak and would make turn times significantly worse. So no. If It could have been done, it would have been done several years ago.
If you wish to be transport costs consciousness, your best bet minimal micromanagement wise would be to use the regional restriction system and make sure you have enough factory production capacity in each region to meet your demand.
Alternatively, you can use the marque production restriction, set up a handful of factories which produce a marque specifically for regions you don't want factories in. However, if you still wanted to keep NA/EU separate with this, you would have to have a marque for each.
The final option would be to use the districting system instead of the autoproduction. It reduces the micromanagement, but you're still manually controlling production and shipping.