why can't rainbow six at least have call of duty controls

first of all ubisoft has stated that they are working on single player. In the game store it also says it will have both single player and co-op. Rainbow six is not at all a clone. In fact the first rainbow six game came out before the first Counter Strike game and many people give credit to rainbow six for defining and refining tactical shooters. Rainbow six will most likely be far more tactical than csgo since it will have 20 operators (i guess like classes) and each one has its own specialty and equipment. The damage model is also set to be more realistic where a pistol can kill in one to three shot approx to give the guy with the shield and pistol a decent chance at actually killing someone unlike the glock from csgo which requires over 9000 shots. lastly rainbow six is set so even those who arent gods at aiming and reflexes can win through teamplay.

edit: i forgot to mention the extremely destructable environment and rappelling system. Definately something to look forward too.

because it pointless to make story mode and end up waste another budget for the game that will be cancel in the next few months (hope you knew what i talking about). plus Siege is not the only game that base on MP only. Division (possible jump to pc too) also base on MP but focus on co-op 4 men team.

for me what i worry the most is its ANTI CHEAT. if they not have something like punkbuster that can kick cheater right on the scene this game will die in one month because i really sure it will get hack since first week.

There will be singleplayer, op is ignorant.

Singleplayer will probably be what was originally Rainbow Six: Patriots, where you, as R6, take on returning veterans/ patriot groups depicting them as "terrorists". EA recently just pulled this sh!t with Hardline.

Counter-Strike is actually unrealistic arcade game and this one provides true Terrorists VS SpecOps exp.

This game has a smaller fan base than that of COD & BF due to his relatively hard style of gameplay. Duh, controls aren't the same, well, it's not COD...lmao. It's not suppose to be easy. If it was, everyone would play it like COD. Please, a cheap clone, Seriously? More like best of the shooter genre.

Based on the previews, Rainbow Six Siege has similar objective as CS:GO. The fact of the matter is, any genuine tactical FPS like Rainbow Six and CS:GO will have similar objectives in-game. Both have small maps and very limited timed scenarios, 2-3minutes, to complete the mission objective.

Don't ever compare Rainbow Six with the likes of CoD and Battlefield. CoD and Battlefield are point and shoot FPS games.

Depends what they make of the game. If it's another Lockdown or Vegas, they can keep it, if they lean more towards the first 3 games, then I would be happy. The balistics should be realistic, the weapon selection should be enormous and we're ready to go. If it's another 300 bullets sponge game lake Vegas was it's just going to be another sad Rainbow Six release.

under 30 usd and no other rubbish DLC, it will be super popular like CS:GO, but over this price, trust me, it's just another EVOLVE

their will be a singleplayer and it aint cheap its 74.99$

Originally posted by Springroll:

under 30 usd and no other rubbish DLC, it will be super popular like CS:GO, but over this price, trust me, it's just another EVOLVE

under 30$? nope

Originally posted by Bard_13:

No single-player and looks like Ubisoft wants to enter in the esports scene.

Last I checked, Counter Strike was actually created as a Rainbow Six clone

This looks worse than that. Somehow CS looks more tactical and realistic than this.
Hitmarkers, running and gunning, heartbeat sensors- this will never be an esports game nor a serious tactical multiplayer game.

It looks like watered down CoD.

Originally posted by Bard_13:

No single-player and looks like Ubisoft wants to enter in the esports scene.

SHUT THE ♥♥♥♥ UP. It's people like you that force publishers and developers to fill games up with pointless bloatware like half-assed singleplayer campaigns and dumb collectibles! I hate Ubisoft sometimes like the next man. But you should at least respect Ubisoft for the decision to NOT put in a pointless, cheap, short, lazy singleplayer campaign, but instead focus solely on the multiplayer component.

I swear, some people will just complain about anything, there's no pleasing them. EA/DICE spend time making terrible singleplayer campaigns - time and money that could've been spent on improving and expanding multiplayer instead - and people ♥♥♥♥♥. Then when Ubisoft actually does what gamers want, they get trash-talk for that too! What in the actual hell.