You clearly dont understand what gaming is all about.

Originally posted by Mad_jack:

You clearly dont understand what gaming is all about.

You must be right since I started gaming on Atari in 1983.

Don't feed...

Originally posted by WireDawg:

Originally posted by Mad_jack:

You clearly dont understand what gaming is all about.

You must be right since I started gaming on Atari in 1983.

but atari came out in 1847

Originally posted by WireDawg:

Originally posted by Mad_jack:

You clearly dont understand what gaming is all about.

You must be right since I started gaming on Atari in 1983.

So you actually think that a date implies something? lol, you are just a simpel person.

Strangely games like this who are simple in appearance have more thought to it than any Call of Duty or Battlefield. Even assasins Creed. Simplicity is not wrong if its done well. And this game has an absolute superb balance of Management and Thinking you need to progress. Graphics arent everything. Again a game that prooves that. Thank you for this great game.

Yes, I am such a simple person I simply won't get duped.

You have no appreciation for pixel art.

Assasins Creed 1, and Syndicate are amazing games, sure they can be somewhat repetative but the combat system was revolutionary in 1, and the graphics of Syndicate are impressive, you have a real sense of being in London.

mad cuz bad

SInce when is Nintendo bad? From what I see they are doing pretty well. WireDawg seems like a strange person.

lol how was assassins creed 1's combat system revolutionary, it did nothing games before it hadn't done (counter, hit, counter, hit) the revolutionary thing about it was the crowd simulation which was miles ahead, but fell short due to bad gameplay, but I digress, this game has all the charm of a classic NES game and all of the strategy of good management games, graphics have got nothing to do with superb gameplay and tbh this is one of the better games I have played in recent years.

Originally posted by WireDawg:

It really makes me sad that with computers today these kind of games are the best people can come up with. This looks like a game from nintendo. Seriously this is 2016 and all you can make is a game for nintendo and even charge for it? Sad sad day for gamers and games.

There are two things that you clearly don't know/understand yet:
- not everyone are interested like you in big 3d games where their main (and sometimes only) quality is realistic or flashy graphics. Many likes 2d games with cartoon-like graphics.
- it is not a matter of 'best' it is a matter of 'choice', probably motivated by previous point.

Originally posted by WireDawg:

Yes, I am such a simple person I simply won't get duped.

Sad troll 0/10. Try again later.

Obvious troll, but I will say that these days it takes at least as much time and energy to create pixel art and animations as it does to make a model and textures.