Yes, SK was not a legitimate successor to Fallen Enchantress LH. I also want to see the true successor of FELH. Costs can be reduced by using SK resources. It will be a great game.

Now that AoW series abandoned fantasy, it's a chance. Turn-based Fantasy 4X is now a blue ocean.

I agree,it appears most of the 4x games are all going in the same direction as CIv so the market is wide open.
The problem is that no competition means less chance we get to choose from several and pick the best game.

I have not sunk enough time into Enchantress,i got bored of it real quick,maybe i'll give it a better shot to see if it is worth making another newer version.I feel from reading another thread that the team prefers going back to the Enchantress game ideas but i also feel that is $$$$ motivated,Enchantress seems like it was more "popular".

This would be no different than if Blizzard made a game BETTER than Wow,it still wouldn't be a similar success because Wow is the fan choice for popularity.

What i am eluding to is that SK deserved to have a lot more success but the effort is not shown in the design.If Stardock or whomever made this wants to see better success,they need to do a better effort.

I agree. I want someone to make either fallen enchantress 2 or sorcerer king 2, but without the jankiness. Poking gaping holes in the balance based on the devs weird design choices is fun but eventually it gets old.

If you ever run into a game that crashes, post a link to your save game and we can check it out.

That said, the problem is that the engine is kind of "jank". Actually, it's a really good engine overall but has terrible, terrible memory management which causes all kinds of problems.