Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
He said: "There is an easy explanation for this: Bad narrative design. My mistake, didn't have this in mind when I wrote each part. 😑"
My source: https://twitter.com/castilianus/status/1147801193630044160
He was very sincere, these mistakes happen. Perhaps in the future he will post some update that corrects this dialogue or modify/add even the narrative, if it is his will.
I believe Donovon was telling Akara how to behave if she ever took control of the neural network, right? At the point in the game where she kills Brandeis, Akara isn’t yet in control of the network, so Donovon’s directive doesn’t apply yet either.
(I know the dev called this a plot hole, but I think above also makes sense?)
So she doesn't want to influence directly the situation but has no problems to do so indirectly.
So turns out it was just a mistake, and this suddenly got me out of the tragedy’s grip. Now imma lie on bed and lie to myself that there’s another ending to this 😤😤
But I love this game, it's still one of my favorites, mainly because of how humble the devs were in dealing with it.