The Red Strings Club

The Red Strings Club

View Stats:
Am I alone on this one?
There is a lot of games that dont do "progressive" example Kingdom Come it didint had any black characters and some people got upset and now this game only has one question about women and there is crying from "anti-sjw" or something like it (I dont even know how to call you guys anymore) about they inserted feminism in a game. my question is do those people understand that they are other side on the same coin?
(sorry for grammar)
< >
Showing 1-3 of 3 comments
Malamasala 11 Mar, 2019 @ 2:10pm 
Saw a youtube video based around the question, so it is a good marketing tool.

I think the main problem is that it is factually false. Women has had a great improvement in life quality... until SJWs arrived and ruined it all. I watch a ton of brilliant and kind female youtubers, and really feel with them when they are attacked and unpersoned by SJW hatemobs.

It is just so weird that these hatemobs get free reign on all social media. A lot of us stand up against them and tell them that what they are attacking are diverse people of different race, gender and sexual orientations. But then they just keep unpersoning people with calling them all "toxic white men" or "Gamergate" or "Comicsgate" or "trolls".

You are simply not allowed to talk and reason with these SJW people. You either agree with them because they are gods, or you are the enemy and should be doxxed, unpersoned, jobless and be known as an assulter on all women.

Technically they are worse than nazis, as nazis "only" attacked Jews and people of other sexual orientations. While SJWs attack EVERYONE, sometimes including their friends.

So the best way to send the message that we want women to have it better, is to just admit that they have it better, and not go around and harass others. No woman is ever going to have a better life because she is a jerk.
Necroscourge 16 Mar, 2019 @ 10:14am 
I think the main problem is that it's factually true. Up until recently in human history, all legal codes treat the male as more important in the relationship between a man and woman. In the earliest versions of immigration law, the woman's nationality was determined by the man she came in with. It's also worth noting that men always get their way in society, and most norms generally service them more than they do women. Religions typically don't count women as anything more than property, which is why the bible discusses the prices a man must pay if they are to rape various kinds of women and the Koran specifies that women must be hidden and given no agency in society. We pretend like all that never happened because now a days, a woman has roughly 40% the same rights a man does right now; they can't go to any country they want, start any business they want, society would pressure them into fitting a norm. They have rights, therefore they aren't oppressed?

So given that I have an education, I was not triggered by this question. Yet it feels like the majority of people stop the youtube video right there and walk away because they see information they know to be true, but because it's a youtube video and nobodies watching, they can just say "Hah, troll!" and pretend it's false.

I think the reason people go "lol, troll!" about this is the simple fact that RSC does not convey evidence to this question, but asserts that you already know the above information about world history. The game tells you that women are oppressed after hitting you with a cast of powerful female characters. So of course most folks are going to forget their world history and blindly say "That's not true, women have the right to own property and vote!" as if that's the same thing as not being oppressed.
Malamasala 16 Mar, 2019 @ 11:10am 
I think it is really positive when people call it a troll and get triggered though. Because you'd really only get triggered if you treat women and men equally already, but a game insults you with "no you don't".

I mean, if I didn't care about women, a game claiming they are oppressed would just make me go "OK. Not like I care how women has it". But if people the question is for will ignore it, and it will only trigger people that the question is false for, what is the purpose of including the question? You are not making any bad people behave better, and you just make nice people angry.

This is kind of like peeing in a cereal. No real point to it as people who won't eat it won't care, and those who wanted to eat it will just be upset.
< >
Showing 1-3 of 3 comments
Per page: 1530 50