Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
To explain, best to look up how other people play this game. For example, a let's play youtuber
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvR_iWeue1E&t=21m
and the player's thought process goes like this:
"should I let women remain oppressed ohmmmm... that's a much larger question than a yes or no... so let's have her expand on that"
That's the flaw in the dialogue design right there.
I believe what you are asking is the following: This is a unique universe set up by the devs, the devs made it so that in this universe women are oppressed, therefore: isn't it unfair to accuse the game of falsely implying women aren't oppressed in a universe in which they are?
Is there any evidence of aliens on the moon? If Akara were to suddenly ask "should we keep ignoring aliens on the moon?" Would a responses such as "huh?" be preposterous or are we to randomly assume this seemingly random information is just a universal axiom to accept in this universe? Should we be called stupid for not believing in them?
To explain what that last paragraph means: there's no evidence of female oppression. Of all things you have reason to believe the opposite is the case. For men, we have a crippled bar owner, a torturer, and ai developer. For women you have a trans corporate employee everyone seems to like who is stupidly sexually aggressive, an islamic lawyer, a leader of a corporation, an ai that potentially controls the world, a suicidal possibly corporate stooge, an office consultant at hr that is gay for the trans, I could go on.
So for the game to naturally spell out, this is what's going on, there'd need to be evidence of it, of which we see the complete and total opposite. So it unnaturally introduces the idea out of nowhere, then slaps you in the face for questioning it.
A better answer to your question would come from the devs themselves who've admitted it's an allegory to real world issues and they wanted to make fun of users for not acknowledging it.
So, sorry to dash your hopes, but this game is political left-leaning vitriol that breaks the fourth wall to mock anything that leans slightly to the right of Stalin.
However, if you throw the middle east into the mix, then you can at least say that oppression does exist which allows you to cut out the third answer. After that it's up to you to decide Yes or No.
But the oppression question was so jarring that I came to the forum to see if there was discussion on it. They could have just included it with the previous question - "Should I allow xenophobia, homophobia and sexism? but they added it separately as an obnoxious trap for people that don't agree with the developer.
The dev's tweet basically said "If you think women aren't oppressed, then you're wrong and either way it makes sense in the game." But the issue is that it totally doesn't make sense in the game. You talk about extreme issues like the free will of humanity, rape and murder, and even can get someone tortured/killed with no repercussion (and Akara describes this as a gift to you!). But not agreeing that women are oppressed is where she completely puts her foot down?? Which is out of character also, as she previously offers factual advice to you but generally accepts your opinion on anything else.
And then there's your point that we don't even know how far this fictional world reflects ours and have no evidence of oppression towards women in the game itself.
It really put a black mark on an otherwise great game. It's a shame because it would have been a really good example of a pro-LGBT game that isn't over the top but it ruins it by letting it's agenda show.