Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If two things were both changed, it could probably be useful:
A) You have to buy and store the equipment, rather than just the tractor. You'd need the tanks and the sprayers and this would take up space in the farm. This would create benefits to not having to store that equipment and using that space for something else.
B) Freeform fields. This would allow you to create much larger individual fields, allowing spraying by aircraft to not look/behave completely silly. As it is, that area would be subdivided into multiple fields, and you'd have to do some sort of pathfinding/order malarkey to allow the aircraft to spray multiple fields in one pass - the closest we have to this behaviour is garbage trucks which are awful at doing more than one thing in sequence. Maybe you could get around this by having a manual waypoint tool for spray paths?
But are planes used to spread fertiliser irl? I always imagined that they spray pesticides, killing everything beneath, just like Muricans love to.
Dropping potato beetles from western planes would fit soviet theme more. :D
I will also comment that offloading fertilization from the farm building to an airfield with crop dusters could potentially be a useful logistical simplification if an airfield with crop dusters has the practical capacity to cover a much larger area than a single farm, both because supplying one airfield with liquid fertilizer is simpler than supplying, say, half a dozen farm buildings with the same and because it's more likely to be convenient to co-locate a crop-dusting airfield and a fertilizer plant than it is to co-locate a fertilizer plant and most of the farms it's supplying. Whether or not that kind of logistical simplification is worthwhile is more debatable, especially if you're not inclined to get into truly large-scale agriculture, but it is nonetheless a potential argument in favor of such a setup.
I would love to use a helicopter sovkhoz so my tractors won't slowly go to those fields to fertilize them, but instead, helicopters will do the job more swiftly.
That said, tractors are doing a fine job of fertilizing, I don't see a reason to use air fertilizers, except for the "cool factor" and yea, giving the airfield some other purpose.