Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You better do something then, instead of just making noise on a random game board.
The leader and founder of the group describes herself as a "Christian Pro Life feminist" and those people are usually hardcore conservative.
This was all done a decade ago, when Germany banned bestiality, incest etc in 2012. Payment processors added it as well, all the way back then.
The silly group and try and claim credit for it, but ya... Just because they claim to be the reason, doesn't make it so.
The Challenge of Consistency
From a neutral standpoint, the challenge of maintaining perfect consistency in one's principles is a widespread phenomenon. People on all sides of the political spectrum may decry certain tactics when used against them, only to employ similar tactics against those with whom they disagree. This can be attributed to:
Self-Preservation: When one's own views or group are perceived to be under attack, the natural instinct can be to retaliate, even if it means using methods previously criticized.
Defining "Cancel Culture" Differently: What one person labels as "cancel culture" (e.g., disproportionate punishment for a minor offense) another might see as legitimate accountability (e.g., consequences for harmful speech). These differing definitions can lead to perceived hypocrisy.
Shifting Goalposts: The criteria for what constitutes an acceptable or unacceptable offense can evolve, and individuals may adapt their responses based on the specific context and their personal convictions at the moment.
Emotional Responses: Debates around social and political issues often evoke strong emotions, which can override purely logical or consistent application of principles.
The perverts obsessed with controlling other people's behavior.
You do realize the Colbert show is a topical show about current events. An episode from a month ago is irrelevant now and will only to get more irrelevant as times goes on. What Trump did was shut down a critic because Colbert wasn't kissing his fat pasty ass.