Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
38 
Denunciar este mensaje
Windows Defender has flagged many game files in the past.
Being an adult game is not a flag.
Neither is a kernel level anti-cheat.
Nor is is a flag to be a single player game.
Anti-cheat in a single player game is because. . . it's a f2p game with a cash shop. They don't want people hacking the cash shop stuff into their accounts.
("cheap-looking T&A f2p game with a cash shop" is probably a red flag, though. Not for "unsafe game", just for cheesy p2w mechanics.)
Not really. Why do you say this is a "red flag"?
Kernel Level Anti-Cheat is a higher risk flag.
Single Player game indicating that a Kernel Level Anti-Cheat isn't even really necessary, also indicates a higher risk.
Windows Defender telling you it's a virus, is also a higher risk.
So is that a no, that Steam doesn't check games before uploaded to make sure they are safe?
If i had "flagged" every game 25 years ago which gave an Anti Virus prompt as a heuristic Scan detected a false positive.......
Anyway, if you believe the game is malicious. Feel free to report it via the store page and let Valve do their thing.
You're free to your opinions, and free to appraise things however you want. Doesn't make it objective fact.
"Higher risk" in your estimation doesn't guarantee risk. So adult game on Steam? There's lots of them. Let's talk when you have an actual example of a threat. Not what you perceive might have some sort of undefinable risk.
You don't like certain anti-cheats, that's fine. Why are you operating under the assumption Valve shares your opinions and values on the subject. What's the risk? Let's talk when you have an actual example of a threat. Not what you perceive might have some sort of undefinable risk.
Single player games? You're free to deem what is necessary in your own projects, not someone else's. You would make different decisions in your projects. And maybe you wouldn't buy this game for the reasons you listed. Ok, well millions of other people are free to make their own choices and aren't bound by your flags, values, or perceptions.
Either Defender is right, and if it's an actual threat. Or it's not, and it's a false positive. Windows Defender raising an issue warrants further investigation. It's not a place to stop and make broad brush claims.
Making a list of lazy and nebulous claims of risk, and summing them up and using that bogus sum to make your claims may not be the big brain move you think it is.
You're not wrong. And once it's been scrutinized and there's nothing there, it doesn't need to be re-scrutinized every time a user hits the same false positive. Or is unaware it's already been addressed.
And Antiviruses still put out false positives with heuristic scans....or do you think?
Adult content on the internet is high risk. If you want to pretend this isn't the case, you can just google it.
A single player game with kernel level anti-cheat is another red flag. If you don't know the amount of access kernel level gives, you should google it.
And it's being flagged by your anti-virus...
But it's the anti-virus that is wrong? Based on what? Experience from 25 years ago?
That's what your argument is.
EDIT: And again, I'm not saying it for sure is. I'm just saying it should cause increased scrutiny above what is normal.