Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Either way, I don't think they'll force devs to split them up.
https://steamhost.cn/app/976730/Halo_The_Master_Chief_Collection/
It contains Halo: Reach, Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary, Halo 2: Anniversary, Halo 3, Halo 3: ODST and Halo 4 as individual DLC of the collection. These ARE purchaseable individually despite being DLC (which sends some mixed messages), but are not individually listed in the library as far as I know. While it mitigates a lot of the issues I described above, it does seem an odd way to handle things, since they are essentially using the DLC entries to create a setup similar to the package feature that Steam offers.
While I haven't played it, I presume this is to allow users to purchase access to whichever game they want, while still allowing them to use Collection-wide functionality such as friends lists and online networking. Which is very cool, and might be an argument for why single-listing collections have merit.
Another Collection variation that I ignored in the main post is collections that re-release a game with (all) DLC included. For example The Sims Legacy Collection https://steamhost.cn/app/3314060/The_Sims_Legacy_Collection/ This is something I personally don't have an issue with, although it would still be nice to have the included DLC use the standard Steam DLC systems, allowing users to see which DLC they own and have access to.
There are also other collections that are using Packages as described above already, which I wanted to highlight and appreciate:
METAL GEAR SOLID: MASTER COLLECTION VOL.1
NINJA GAIDEN: MASTER COLLECTION
MySims
Next to that, with a fairly sizable library, I tend to (attempt to) keep my library neat and organized. The fact that these collections are hard to categorize in regards to whether I am playing them, have them finished, or have yet to start them are forever an inconvenience. And with more and more retro games being re-released on Steam using these collections, this will only start happening more and more often. And since these collections are often the only legal way to acquire these classics, there is no way around it either.
I would love for this to be applied to all existing collections, but understand that that is near impossible. But hopefully my suggestion is taken into consideration by Valve, and be applied to the (hopefully) many future re-releases of all the classic games.
Are the Call of Duty games available under a single listing as a Collection? I couldn't find anything like that in my quick search. All of these games are individually available, right?
And regardless of whether Valve will implement this, would you want them to? I'm curious whether other people care, or whether it's just me!
Many entertainment products are packaged as collections. Why would video games be any different?
And I don't see Valve forcing that onto the devs.
Interesting, thank you. For me it's actually discouraging me from purchasing some of these collections. I greatly appreciate them being brought to Steam and having the ability to purchase them, but it makes them feel so inconvenient.
You're right that this happens in other media as well, although when a book gets bound into a collection of a few books, all of these books are still available individually in bookstores as well. And DVD collections often still had each movie on an individual disk, for example.
Having said that, if these collections existed but also allowed all their games to be purchased individually, that would obviously be a better solution for everyone
Valve will not interfere with developers or publishers development decisions in any shape or form and they are free to publish their games in any shape or form. If you have complaint about a game, please post your complaint in that game's hub or contact the developer or publisher directly. They are the only party that make the changes you want.
I don't see how telling publishers to create individual listings is different than their recent rules regarding linking other developers products on your store page, or disallowing NFT games on their storefront. Encouraging publishers to use the 'package' and 'bundle' functionality Steam provides for what it was made for, rather than grouping them as one listing does not seem impossible or out of character for Steam.
Whether you agree with what I'm suggesting or not, saying that this is not something that should be directed at Steam is odd to me. Things like this change through policies and regulation, which can only be enforced and upkept by Steam and therefore should be directed to them.
You'll find that the policies they made aren't for the benefit or protection of consumers, you'll find it's ultimately to protect themselves.
While I can understand certain policy changes as being neat, this is a suggestion I cannot "support" since it in essence means you want Valve to be a bully. I don't support bullies.
Please leave aside any opinions on the business practices or moral validity of Steam policies, since this is not a thread regarding that topic.
You seem to forget that these games are not made specifically for Steam.
They get sold on other places as well and often enough they aren't really individual games.
I don't see the issue. You name 4 'issues", but to me none of those are anything beyond pet peeves of you, OP.
What you mention about these collections also being sold on other platforms, and this change requiring the Steam releases to potentially be different from those that are released on Playstation, Epic, etc is valid. That's something I had considered too, and one of the larger downsides. Having said that, in theory nothing would stop the publishers from also releasing their games individually on those platforms.
I don't understand what you mean with "they aren't really individual games". Can you give an example? Everything included in the collections mentioned here has been previously released as individual games.
Youre also wrong about books. There have been books that were previously published individually that could only be bought as a part of an anthology for at minimum, 40 years.
This isnt an issue. Its a personal preference and Valve is not going to force your personal preference on people, no matter how you dress it up.