Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
If you do not agree with the EULA after purchase, ask for a refund, which will be granted no questions asked within 14 days after purchase AND within at most 2 hours playtime.
My suggestion would save me a lot of time doing so, as I could knock out while swaths of games without having to comb through their Eula, preventing decision fatigue, creating fewer human errors (with pretty severe legal consequences), and mean folks could find more games that they are actually willing to spend money on faster. There's only so much effort a day any given person is going to spend reading eulas to determine if a game is playable for them. This puts folks in front of the games they want faster, and makes the barrier to buying a game lower
If it is a concern to you, just read the documents.
Naturally this counts as one of those features that if users were accurately apprised of it would result in fewer sales so it is understandable that devs and Valve prefer it be hidden. Remember Valve does not require devs accurately describe any sort of system requirements like "Online Connection Required" so these sorts of agreement overreaches are almost certainly beyond the scope of what they will track
It is your responsibility as the consumer to inform yourself before purchasing of what you are actually going to purchase.
Still, if there then is no meaningful detriment to providing the information and there is no way it can provide a negative impact then I agree that they can put it up. This is another situation where I would be perfectly happy to let practical real world evidence show that my initial hypothesis was wrong.