Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Advocating violence as a phrase in the hands of a moderator can mean almost anything he wants. Saying X deserves the death penalty after a fair trial can and has counted before so in my experience these definitions are in practice just exercises of "Who? Whom?" Does the moderator like the speaker? Then it is not violence, obviously.
On the other hand this recent war has been reduced to some of the most appalling displays of sports team cheering I have ever seen as everyone rushes to make everything about "me, me, ME!" So I can see eucivic benefits in shutting those types up as unlikely as it would be to find moderation that can distance itself from both sides equally.
https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/discussions/forum/10/6257258782505545458/
They do, yes. For anything they can not handle themselves, they tell users to post here and link it in their ticket.