Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also, it doesnt matter.
Steam either figures out on its own that there are direct payment methods and other payment processors or it will see its entire business burn over whatever the f the flavor of the month social media outrage is.
Mark my words:
If this sht stays, then its only a question of time before you will get the "video game violence" folks start bombing rounds on everyone's library.
I've been here for 20 years but thankfully there are other platforms out there who sell games without drm and allow you to even download and keep the installer offline, so not owning anything i buy on steam was strike one, but now with this sh*t, im done with paying steam a single fck of a dime.
Yeah, those games should have never been allowed. The developers of those games should have had more common sense. Even if the game is about incest and rape, you don't name your game "Incest Tales: Webcam Daughter"...that's just asking for trouble.
And I do think, eventually, they will be removing violence in video games. It really only a matter of time. Well, that assumes they don't illegalize video games before then, you know, because they are unproductive wastes of time...
What happened is that "no mercy" got rather negative global attention directed at steam. Look up "no mercy controversy" on google if you want more info. This made the local news for the state that steam is physically located in: https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/video-game-no-mercy-pulled-steam-bellevue-company-platform/281-2f2f9887-0c21-4c41-a52c-ab2547c748d6
Steam is not a super popular platform in many circles, I know many adults that don't know what I'm talking about when I mention it. But they know words like "rape" and "incest" and know that they don't want their kids anywhere near that and think that any business selling it should be banned....
And then the obvious question, how does someone buy things on steam when most payment providers have a firm "no-porn" policy?
Such as paypal
https://www.paypal.com/us/cshelp/article/what-is-paypal%E2%80%99s-policy-on-transactions-that-involve-sexually-oriented-goods-and-services-help384
So now, the topic isn't really about steam at all - now it's about, why is paypal (and other payment providers) violating their own stated policy?
Steam is a little fish compared to these payment processors. They would totally let steam die if steam wants to make this the hill they die on. So steam will bend the knee, but not to activists, to payment processors.
The only way someone would see it is if they MANUALLY deactivated the filter.
Child accounts cannot access this option as part of the parental controls from the parents account.
If the crazy activists want to do something, then they need to go after the places that sell supplies that are used in rape and murder.
In video games, no one is hurt.
As I never tire of or have cause to cease saying, if you want to see the modern anti-porn crusader, simply show a guy who nominally approves of porn something outside his comfort zone. The only people with internal consistency in this argument are the ones who want to ban it all, and they are the absolute smallest minority and only get allies of convenience as the comfort zone du jour changes.
(Extra credit: Do the financial interests that have outsized curation and veto powers over media people can access also influence the comfort zone du jour in a manner not dissimilar to how youtubers dictate forum discourse? If so, would that explain why people often ignore "Just wait til corpos ban what YOU like." so often? If what they like is programmed by the people doing the banning, is there any surprise they have no fear and actually much support for the bans?)