Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
For example, in Japan, there is a an online archive of manga called Manga Library Z.
Many of the hosted mangas are out of print, so your only hope of reading some (legally) would be to subscribe to the site.
Recently however, certain major payment processors mandated to the website, that certain words and content will not be allowed, and should they continue to provide access to those old manga, the pp's will refuse service.
If given an viable alternative where they can continue to provide their service and content relatively unhindered the owners and operators of Manga Library Z would absolutely use it.
They aren't setup to be a bank, and they seem content in experimenting with hardware, not banking, which is significantly far less of a risk than starting a payment method with loads of customers that are unknown as to how well they bank.
As a side note, they likely still wont be taking any form of crypto any decade soon since about half of the transactions were fraudulent.
What keeps most companies from developing and using their own is that the initial cost and maintenance isn't commiserate with the benefit of owning your own.
That being said, you could setup your own payment processor for half a years salary for a Valve employee (about 2 million usd.)
That is completely false, the regulations and requirements are created by the government and banks and have nothing to do with the payment processors who are forced to comply with them.
It's far from impossible, but it takes significant upfront investment and can take quite a while to get all the approvals needed, to do the testing and certification.
And if payment processors still go against the normal steam over it would they be liable for any damages?
Which isn't a thing here. There are multiple payment processors, more then 4 in the US alone, and others have created their own payment processors.
I mean you keep claiming its forbidden to create one, yet facts show you are wrong. In recent years apple and google have both created their own payment processors for instance which disproves your claim that its forbidden
And from what expertise did you derive this hum dinger from? I mean this is clearly, "I can imagine Valve can do anything trivially, so they can." No. Just no.
It's like your whole post is trying to be the poster boy example for the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Oh yes, entities with money never lobby or bribe politicians. Politicians never write legislation to benefit certain businesses.
Completely false? Not sure if you don't know what completely means, or what false means.
Not impossible isn't a synonym for realistically possible, especially given the context of "Valve should make a payment processor because a small number of games may raise red flags with business partners".
It's all desperate neckbeard fever dream madness.