Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
pick 1
Being an enemy of corporations is supposed to suck. It is how you can tell who is a playfighting poser who is just claiming to do so out of fashion and who is not.
These companies don't want just to be used to transfer money to buy these games, they want the softhouses bankrupt and employees fired. They wanna signalize virtue to a few crazy and hysterical women.
They know pretty well that if the games remain listed and other payment methods are available to buy them, ppl will just use those methods and the result will just be that those methods will grow and the softhouses will remain in business.
Only those companies would lose and we'd all win.
How about no?
We pick the games, ♥♥♥♥ VISA/MC.
Kinda sounds like Itch didn't have any vetting process and there was no way for them to figure out which games had what content, so they went shotgun approach. I am not sympathetic to their cavalier business practices.
Sounds like Itch has to grow up a bit. Boo hoo.
And if that never happens then all the wheel spinning you're doing right now is a foolish waste of time to massage your own ego. So let's talk when GTA, God of War, or Castlevania or Final Fantasy are banned.
Being able to imagine a bottomless downward spiral isn't some great feat, and it's not very creative.
Payment Processors are allowed to have terms for their service. Valve has terms for its service, including removing games for certain content. Valve has agreed to the terms. And some people are very upset by it. Well, welcome to the real world.
The issue is not the how Steam gets the money for the questionable content, but the fact that Steam gets money for the questionable content. Offering certain games on Steam alone is enough to enforce a cease and desist, no matter the payment method; Neither Visa nor Mastercard want to be held liable for the sale of (potentially) questionable content.
No, moving to government controlled payment service is even worse. That's another step towards getting an actual fascist government, first they'll disarm their citizens, then they'll move to control all aspects of payment transactions so they can directly control what the people can cannot buy.
Rape/incest games can potentially be obscene content, which is illegal even in the USA...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/obscenity
https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-ceos/obscenity
Anyone make visa/MasterCard aware of such content, it makes sense why VISA/MC would choose to get that content removed because of the risk they hold if that content is found to be illegal.
VISA/MC could be held liable for it if it turns out it's illegal content.
https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladviceofftopic/comments/1m8oi92/comment/n527of5/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=usertext&utm_name=Steam&utm_term=1&utm_content=t1_n5hoq3m
Of course, the situation got back to normal, our transactions are still handled more like between "person, bank, business", but vendors are still wary about the government trying to get involved, so they are ready to ditch PIX if it ever happens..