Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Sold them individualy though.
That would be better if 1 person needed a cpu upgrade and the other person needed a replacement board who already has that type of cpu and ram.
Now i have 96gb RAM
Those aren't quite ten year old components, more like just under 7-ish. Somewhere between 5 and 7 years tends to be where once-higher-end-in-their-time parts begin showing their age, but they will likely still be some degree of useful. AMD's closest comparison would be the 3700X, which is a bit slower than it, and it's still fine today. "Not great, not terrible" describes that range of performance.
Now if that was two generations older, it'd have a LOT less value because the upcoming end of support for Windows 10 is about to push all that stuff into legacy status because Windows 11 doesn't support it (it supports yours though). Someone is probably going to try and mention that Windows 10 won't instantly be unusable, or that bypasses exist (and they'll not touch on the drawbacks of doing this), or that Linux exists, but none of that changes the point. The point is that for the majority of the market on Windows, it's not going to be supported, has drawbacks, and is aging and slow now so it inherently has near-nil value for the majority of the market.
nVidia cards beginning with "GT" or "GTX" instead of "RTX" will be in the same situation soon (the GTX 16xx series aside) after the 580.xx branch of drivers, since 59x.xx won't support Pascal (GTX 10 series) and older. AMD's graphics prior to RDNA (and honestly including RDNA1 maybe) are in "sort of supported in delayed fashion or not at all" as well.
Everything becomes legacy eventually. But your 9900K isn't worthless, not yet.
For the CPU, motherboard, and RAM together, you could probably get a couple, maybe a few, hundred. One potential drawback I can see is that most people looking at such old hardware as a bundle will probably want it for the reason that it would be cheap, but the highest-in-socket CPU and high capacity of RAM sort of work against that (meaning, if you list it for "what it's worth", it will probably greatly decrease your potential buyers). So you might have to sell it a bit below value. But that's better than throwing it out, getting nothing, and trashing still usable hardware in my eyes.
A 12th Gen i7 + MB + the needed DDR4 would barely be that much and those could be grabbed new
People will pay silly amounts of money for the fastest CPU that will go into a socket, because it allows them to bypass buying a new motherboard/RAM. No, it's not always smart, but there are people who do it so it's hard to argue it can't sell for whatever amount people are buying them for.
So that CPU + motherboard + 64 GB RAM could probably get a couple or few hundred, depending. It might get a little more parted out, but the time and effort of doing so might not be worth it.
That's my stance too.