Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
m&ms are not and have never been sexy, you know where you live
I forgot about the thing when the feminists told the green M&M she had to dress less slutty for work, lol
At this rate all games will look like all the anime gacha games with big breasted female characters in skimpy outfits. Which means games will be absolutely boring cash grabs. Any type of realism or storytelling will be lost. Sad, but that's probably how gaming will be in the future.
depend if the game is fun or not
personally i avoid game force you crappy romance or boring story
Also did I confuse it with something else or was there controversy for Yotei over voice actor being trans rather than the looks of the protag? Kind of a weird thing to complain about.
I'm at the point where I think most of these games would be better off if they ditched the romance options entirely.
Perfect example, in Baldur's Gate 3 there's a Wizard on your team named Gale who has a long back story about falling in love with a goddess and being cursed from his romantic affairs with her. But because every character in the game has to have the option to be romanced by both genders, apparently he's willing to throw all that back story away and risk messing with his curse to go experiment with some dude in the bushes. Like... why do we need that, really?