Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
EVs are getting better when it comes to affordability so maybe my next car (after my current one) dies then maybe I’ll consider an EV.
Gasoline engines are for people who want to have fun.
Also refueling is a lot quicker in gas engines.
A hybrid has both the problems and some of the benefits of both types.
Gas usually wins.
also with electricity you use more energy to do same effort than with thermal, but if your electricity come from renew or nuclear power plant it is better to use electric car, if you mostly use oil better to use gas engine than waste them in electricity to run electric car
I would have thought the combustion engine vs the EV, but if methane is your choice then who am I to disagree on your topical choice.
I drove a taxi for a while which ran on gas (propane, I believe?), and it was good, even though it looked a bit weird (Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 7 seats
This was back in the late 90s, when there were many of those here, especially as taxis, but not sure how common it is anymore. They could only be filled at a few locations.
The council (back in the late 90s early 2000s) there litter picker teams trucks were gas too and I am going to say propane but cannot remember it exactly now).
also the pedantry is cute, eurokuns :3c
what was the fuel for the car used in the first moon walk? couldn't have been usual gas, because there is no oxygen on the moon.
EVs have a constant torque curve. ICE engines produce torque at a curve, with an optimal RPM for best performance. Keeping the engine in that RPM range for best efficiency is usually done with a bunch of gears in the transmission. Electric makes full torque at any RPM so it doesn't need a transmission.
If you powered electric motors with energy generated from an ICE, you'd theoretically have the best performance and best efficiency. This might be a job for inexpensive, non toxic, but lower energy density sodium ion batteries.
Gas. People forget that EVs were the primary form of motor vehicle in the late 1800's, gas won because it's more energy dense and you can refill it faster and those advantages have never gone away.
That's a myth. They have very high immediate "breakaway" torque (at very low efficiency) which is normally the value that is made a big deal of, then the torque falls off linearly as RPM increases until you reach "back EMF limits" where the motor is acting like a generator and opposing the current you're feeding in to it where the torque falls off of a cliff.
Are you just bored, baiting or do you have an opinion of your own the subject?