Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
what kind of psychos come up with such a thought in the first place.
It would be over in about 5 to ten men at the absolute most unless they were deficient in some way.
A black Mamba will hunt you.
The bloat fly will hunt you.
A silverback would be in protection mode against men.
They've been doing these sorts of matchup battle debates for literal decades, and they range from reasonable to ridiculous. Hippo vs rhino, grizzly vs crocodile, Iron Man vs Batman, My very favorite was ten trillion lions vs the US Marine Corps.
They went on a Silverback gorilla kick with these things in the wake of Harambe, so the shoe fits, lol.
Anyway, I'm not convinced the gorilla could win even if the men were only allowed to stand in a grid twenty feet apart perfectly still and get clobbered. I think the gorilla would KO itself from exhaustion way before killing 100 dudes.
Yes I would. I would pull its tail and run. Then I'd probably go get a hamburger while the other 99 guys are fighting.