安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Sounds like that amounted to nothing.
The Russians beat cleats back home the second it was clear which way the wind was blowing.
Turns out that invading Ukraine is eating up a hell of a lot more manpower and resources that ol' Vlad likes to let on.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly5zmm186no
We're still playing the old "enemy of my enemy" game.
Worked out super well when we armed and funded the Mujahedeen fighting Russia in Afghanistan.
And again when we armed and funded Saddam when he was fighting Iran.
You'd think we'd learn, but the American electorate (and therefore our leadership) likes nothing more than to "look forward and move on" when the past is inconvenient or embarrassing.
Don't forget funding ukraine after ww2 if we needed them to fight the soviet union.
Ukraine was part of the USSR up until it collapsed. There was no "independent" Ukraine in the immediate aftermath of WW II.
There is now--and to be clear, it should stay that way.