All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details
Is vaping actually better than smoking long term?
So we have known that smoking cigarettes can lead to cancer for a long time now. However vaping has been around for almost 20 years now so I’m curious if there is any studies showing that vaping is actually better than smoking long term?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 21 comments
They contain much fewer of the known harmful chemicals in smoking, but they're relatively new so there's not much known about the long term effects

In my opinion that makes them a bit more unnerving
depends. would you rather have tar buildup in the lungs (which can actually be reversed with time after quitting), or trace metal buildup in your brain (which cant be)
Apparently it also causes lung damage and increases risk to cancer, so... probably not that much better.
Originally posted by TGC> The Games Collector:
Apparently it also causes lung damage and increases risk to cancer, so... probably not that much better.
:steamthumbsup:
"Better" doesn't mean "good".

"A somewhat lower chance of getting cancer" is nothing to brag about.

It's less annoying for non-smoking bystanders, so I am still glad, they exist, since some of my smoking friends switched over.
Last edited by Stingray_tm; 18 hours ago
na, vaping causes different issues... especially when it's not regulated.
you could not engage in the activity that looks suspiciously like sticking a certain kind of erotic device to your mouth. :V
Originally posted by *ੈ✩‧₊˚༺☆Prinny☆:
you could not engage in the activity that looks suspiciously like sticking a certain kind of erotic device to your mouth. :V
that's a new argument :P
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY1eXnbB1Mg
Originally posted by *ੈ✩‧₊˚༺☆Prinny☆:
you could not engage in the activity that looks suspiciously like sticking a certain kind of erotic device to your mouth. :V
if OP wants to smoke a robo probe, who are we to judge?
Just because vaping is less dangerous than smoking doesn’t mean it’s not dangerous. It’s like “is a rocket launcher more dangerous than a grenade launcher”.
Originally posted by Paulie:
Originally posted by *ੈ✩‧₊˚༺☆Prinny☆:
you could not engage in the activity that looks suspiciously like sticking a certain kind of erotic device to your mouth. :V
if OP wants to smoke a robo probe, who are we to judge?
you're right. it's a new century and robosexuals are people too :V
smoking is great... i only vape THC oils
Last edited by 󠀡󠀡; 18 hours ago
Originally posted by 󠀡󠀡:
smoking is grea... t i only vape THC oils
riiight
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4nj57NHREE
Originally posted by Xero_Daxter:
Just because vaping is less dangerous than smoking doesn’t mean it’s not dangerous. It’s like “is a rocket launcher more dangerous than a grenade launcher”.
yes, a rocket launcher is far more dangerous than a grenade launcher, Rocket launchers have back blast which can kill you in a confined space. on the opposite side however grenade launchers (at least US/Nato M203 style rounds) have an internal fuse that requires the grenade to fly for a set distance before coming armed. meaning if you are in a confined space under 8 feet, you will not be harmed.
Originally posted by kingjames488:
Originally posted by 󠀡󠀡:
smoking is grea... t i only vape THC oils
riiight
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4nj57NHREE
😎
< >
Showing 1-15 of 21 comments
Per page: 1530 50

All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details