Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Still, panopticon designs should be the standard.
Men and women are victims of the same system. The behaviours you describe are the product of women who have been taught that their only survival mechanism in the social dominance hierarchy is to pair up with an aggressive and productive man. That is both false and demeaning to their self-esteem. The men are taught that the only way to attract a woman is to be aggressive, productive, and out-compete the other men. The result is that the men work themselves to death and kill each other, the women fight over the winner (who is traumatized from the behaviours he learned to achieve victory), and nobody is happy.
There is a blame to be put on women for it, it's 2025 now and it's time they stop fawning over the barbarian. I don't care if that offends some people.
Clearly
After fully reading your comment, I can somewhat agree with you. A lot of women think the way they do because our governments and teaching institutions failed them.
Ideally, our schools should be teaching boys and girls that a man is someone as described in this post, to prevent the girls perceiving non-conflict boys as wimps/weak, etc.
This wouldn't solve the issue of girls perceiving non-conflict boys as wimps, it would just create the problem we now have.
What's a panopticon