It becomes as much about health risk and what line should the government have in taxes your intimate moments, as a it is about morality. So it is a more complicated issue than it seems at first, but honestly if people are willing to take the risk, they should be allowed to do it.

You talking about politics peeps ? 'coz many politics can be aptly described as wenches, ♥♥♥♥♥♥, arse-to-sell, complaisant with money, ready to open up and being openned up at the mention of mullah.

yeah

To be honest, yes it probably should be.
It happens already but it is illegal and sketchy. People would be better off getting a $100 tug than spending $!00 on some OF model.

Originally posted by Moogal:

Yes, imo but i do not want to make this (too) political and polarized

yes, but only if it protect sex worker

It already is in the US.

No, wouldn't be wise to encourage the average folk to have reckless sex. Deterring the spread of STDs would be most important, health concerns.

Tesla AI Companion Catgirl Robot Waifus.

It'll dominate the market.

Only if it is done with focus on the worker.
So union, safety, obligatory health checks and so forth.

In a more advanced way, it should be an education with it, that would give you a permit

Yes but I'm not doing anyone without any health screening first.

Originally posted by Doctor Go-Go:

No, wouldn't be wise to encourage the average folk to have reckless sex. Deterring the spread of STDs would be most important, health concerns.

But what if it was regulated and the girls had to use protection, or be clean?
As it stands it is a vector because they are all sketchy scummy people in back alleys or asian massage parlors.

it will only be legal if the govt finds a way to take some money from the transaction, aka as tax
if there are people willing to pay for a service there will be people offering it, people will do it regardless legal or not. As it has been done since forever. Even men with good looking wives sometimes go for that service.

Originally posted by xDDD:

Originally posted by Doctor Go-Go:

No, wouldn't be wise to encourage the average folk to have reckless sex. Deterring the spread of STDs would be most important, health concerns.

But what if it was regulated and the girls had to use protection, or be clean?
As it stands it is a vector because they are all sketchy scummy people in back alleys or asian massage parlors.

Wouldn't be worth the expense and it wouldn't be worth the risk. They would still break rules and have unprotected sex and spread things.

Shouldn't encourage young women and men to get into the practice of fooling around with easy prostitutes rather than each other. They need to spend that short time mingling with each other producing HEALTHY offspring.

Originally posted by Breathe:

Originally posted by AdahnGorion:

Only if it is done with focus on the worker.
So union, safety, obligatory health checks and so forth.

In a more advanced way, it should be an education with it, that would give you a permit

Like a more heavily involved sex therapist?

Indeed.
It would bring much value to society

Originally posted by Doctor Go-Go:

Originally posted by xDDD:

But what if it was regulated and the girls had to use protection, or be clean?
As it stands it is a vector because they are all sketchy scummy people in back alleys or asian massage parlors.

Wouldn't be worth the expense and it wouldn't be worth the risk. They would still break rules and have unprotected sex and spread things.

Shouldn't encourage young women and men to get into the practice of fooling around with easy prostitutes rather than each other. They need to spend that short time mingling with each other producing HEALTHY offspring.

Why would someone who's whole business is having sex, take a risk of pregnancy or catching and spreading disease?