Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
humans on the other hand can be covered in their own drool (me), or albert einstein.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5FNoFIfl1Y&ab_channel=FuturamaOrama
Is is western based scale tests? (Stanford-Binet, Wechsler, etc.) is it adaptability? what about Gardners MI take? is it critical thinking? is it a combination? is it....
I would go as far to say, that humans are extremely alike and when it comes to general behaviour, we have very similar patterns.. (then again, I think we are just meat robots, so...)
awesome hahaha. i have a few tattoos myself, but very small and simple ones. i do love futurama, especially the pre movie seasons.
We only see the ones that were not so stupid they were useless/liability. Or the ones that were not excessive risk takers, some risk taking good, too much, bad.
The most intelligent of them, there is no real benefit above a certain level of intelligence so you don't see super genius animals knowingly.
They don't really out compete above average or average, in a meaningful way.
Is semi ironic so many people are obsessed with intelligence, being a max value of 200 or 300 w/e system you use, is actually borderline worthless, nobody really needs 120+ IQ. It's basically wasted potential in the current environment.
But to answer your question, all mammals have this wide range, its also present in birds since they can be pretty smart and dumb, we not done nearly enough observation of strange things like cephalopods to be sure either way.
very simplefied there is raw awareness and than there sekf awarenes..
nothing but humans has a soul, quite simply.
we are made in Gods image, have that spark that 2d layer.. annimals do not.
you cant really tag the same iq score humans have on annimals.
but if we compare that raw 1st layer..
animals in general do have a larger spread percentually than humans.
-
humans went trough the flood 13000ish years ago and this genetic bottleneck still shows humans have far less genetic diversity than other spieces..
with only 6000 ish humans left 11500ish years ago.. basicly our spread was massivle tightend
human iq range :
globally 99.99% would fall between
60 and 140 (+/- 40%)
if you exclude africans (who tend to have an outlyer low average iq of 74 vs 96 average for latins/indians for europeans 98 for asians 104..)
than the 99.99 spread is more +/- 25%
=====
now the smartest annimals chimps have am iq range of about 8 to 30
wihing 1 group... and 5 to 35 as a spieces..
the numbers are lower for urang utangs, dolfins celapods and crows who follow..
but this large spread with a far less concentrated bellcurve than humans is common.
aka the dumbest human may have half the iq of the smartest one.
while the dumbest annimal in a spieces has between an sixth to a twentiest the iq of the smartest in his spiecss. with their iq spread bellcurve a lot more flattend too.
ofcource in absolute numbers this gap is smaller.. like 5-35 is only 30 points apread.. but relatively it is much wider.