veles (Ausgeschlossen) 24. Juli um 18:31
5
2
2
Actually, the removal of gooner games is good
Cry more, degens.

Edit: Before I went to sleep, I thought my rage bait failed. I'm glad to see you guys gave it your best shot after all.

To address the common complaints...

>Muh precedent set
The precedent that the payment processors can do whatever the ♥♥♥♥ they want and censor whoever they want has been set long ago. The fact that none of their censorship from the past bothered you, but you exploded over some incest porn games is absolutely hilarious.

>Duh they'll come for your AAA game next!
No, they won't. The payment processors clearly had no issues with your precious GTA and profiting from it. This is clearly about insane sexual fetishes being peddled

>Buht this random activist group said...
I don't care about some irrelevant activist group.

>Muh christofascism
Christofascism is when incest and paedo porn is bad?
Zuletzt bearbeitet von veles; 25. Juli um 5:00
< >
Beiträge 115 von 382
It means Valve is going to have to curate the content on their platform.

Like a publisher.

Even though they're just a digital platform.

Does this mean we can sue BlueSky for allowing what people post there?

Sounds good to me.
veles (Ausgeschlossen) 24. Juli um 18:40 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von MinionJoe:
It means Valve is going to have to curate the content on their platform.
They've always been doing that.
Nah, it sucks.
They do still have Mahjong Strip Solitaire: Harem Guild.

Which is actually really fun and hard.

Definitely buying it again.

Thanks for reminding me.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von MinionJoe:
Sounds good to me.
Man it's interesting watching all the freedom of speech people simp hard for christofascism censorship in gaming.
i wish the word "goon" still meant goombahs and underlings of mafioso
First they come for the goons, then they come for the guns. Either way, it'll be funny.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von MinionJoe:
It means Valve is going to have to curate the content on their platform.

Like a publisher.

Even though they're just a digital platform.

Does this mean we can sue BlueSky for allowing what people post there?

Sounds good to me.
they actually used to currate games and had a much stricter process of getting games published on steam in the past. But for a while its just been almost anything goes.
I think that stuff is for sick degenerates too, but it never stops there. Next will be demanding censoring GTA because you can beat up hookers, which is the same "sexual violence" excuse used here. And eventually it's even more infuriating political virtues.

The current state of gaming is already as poor as it is because non-gamer activists infiltrated the industry over a decade ago and began trying to censor certain content and insert their own political ideology. There is no excuse to let this happen again and stand by while new are doing the same.
That guy's profile would be enough to block let alone this thread...
Ursprünglich geschrieben von admiral1018:
I think that stuff is for sick degenerates too, but it never stops there. Next will be demanding censoring GTA because you can beat up hookers, which is the same "sexual violence" excuse used here. And eventually it's even more infuriating political virtues.

The current state of gaming is already as poor as it is because non-gamer activists infiltrated the industry over a decade ago and began trying to censor certain content and insert their own political ideology. There is no excuse to let this happen again and stand by while new are doing the same.
Shark cards are very profitable and Rockstar surely can afford genetically enhanced cyborg lawyers.
veles (Ausgeschlossen) 24. Juli um 19:05 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von L1qu1dator:
That guy's profile would be enough to block let alone this thread...
Maybe if you had a personality you could make yours better.
It isn't about the degenerate games, it's about the precedent set.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von CookieClicker :):
Ursprünglich geschrieben von xDDD:
It isn't about the degenerate games, it's about the precedent set.
The one that's been set already?
The one that is continually set. Or multiple ones, perhaps.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von veles:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von MinionJoe:
It means Valve is going to have to curate the content on their platform.
They've always been doing that.
lol, lmao even
< >
Beiträge 115 von 382
Pro Seite: 1530 50