Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Daddy, did you have another family?
Sounds like something a poor person would say.
i am poor, i just said i was.
I dont want a family.
And $100K/yr is chump change.
Take the money.
I'm used to having no social life.
Moreover, median household income for a family of 5 in the U.S.A. for a family of three is $107,100[infogram.com] so you actually earn more and it goes up until you hit seven or more when it suddenly spikes back down to $99,600 (I would guess at that point you probably need one parent at home at all times) so with a family you're actually earning more than $100,000.
By making it possible to have a poly family you're giving me free reign to provide a middle class lifestyle to a hypothetically infinite number of spouses in a harem each with their own children.
Plus ultimately, I don't see much point in pursuing wealth just for the sake of it. There comes a point wherein a single person hits a point of diminishing returns on their income so much, that earning more is pointless. I'm only going to live so long, and a segment of my life is over already.
What could I possibly spend $100,000 upon yearly with nobody to share it with?
I remember in 2010 a study determined that peak happiness occurs at $75,000[www.cbsnews.com], and while newer research suggests otherwise (showing it peaks at $500,000) let's assume that the $75,000 true for a moment.
Adjusting for inflation that would mean the optimal income is $110,944.32.
Not really all that much more than $100,000.
Now considering that the typical family is 4 or 5 people I'm thinking that the number would be drastically cut for just one person. Perhaps not with perfect linearity since some expenses may be fixed. but to an extent. I just don't think I'd need $100,000 unless I had somebody with whom to share it.
So in this hypothetical scenario I think it'd be wiser to take the family. The fact that I can have a social life if I want too is a bonus.
In real life where there are no guarantees and no restrictions on behavior, I'm striking it out on my own though.
Does it have a heart to love and to be loved?