Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
They're better off gagging her and executing her in public. MAGA: the party of transparent corruption.
"Unalive" is a technical term that is used in gaming. It's synonymous to coercion.
It's gaming terminology, generally used in the pacifist scene. As far as I know, it's not harmful.
Unalive means neutralizing a live entity in a game by rendering it inactive and potentially causing it to re-spawn, but not directly by an immediate player action.
For example during a "battle royal" or a "tower defense" game, in which enemies are swept away automatically, for instance by an in-game flood or natural phenomenon rather than by a player who makes a direct move on them.
Other examples are inn-fighting; An ally that neutralizes an opponent; An adversary being disabled by walking into a trap, by being panned or walked off screen, or by infestation, domination and or possession. Causing these entities to be neutralized, but without any direct actions that the player makes on such entities.
The difference between unalive and neutralize is that in theory, an entity would still be able or have time to avoid neutralization as it could make it's choices. Additionally, it also means that it remains possible for another entity to prevent this sub-process of neutralization.
=get epsteined.
They called you soft but then they deleted their original post