Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If it was as simple as that, I wouldn't be here.
I'm not sure what you mean by "tied to". But, as far as average IQ, there is a correlation.
No it's not. When I google "how do we know that all ethnicities have the same average capacity for intellignce" the first result is the wiki page for Race and Intelligence. I'm not asking about race. Ethnicities are more granular. For example, Bantus, Khosians, and Melonesians would all be considered "Black" by race while being very different ethnicities. The second result is a reddit thread that devolves into unintelligible ****-flinging and so on.
Then how would you measure intelligence. You just said that ethnicity isn't tied to intelligence. I assume you have some way of measuring and verifying this (outside of IQ). If what you're saying is correct, then we would expect the distribution of intelligence to be random and totally uncorrelated to ethnicity.
If I changed the prompt, then I would be asking a different question.
I'm not asking about race, though. The wiki page is going to say that both "race" and "intelligence" are flawed concepts. Race is a flawed concept, which is why I'm not interested in it.
But you would have to be pretty intellectually dishonest or braindead to claim that intelligence isn't real.
But no one knows whether there are also innate IQ disparities between ethnicities. It's possible, but they're likely quite small if they exist at all.
There's not a lot of research being done on the topic, for obvious reasons. Say you've found a genetic component to intelligence that is not equally distributed among populations. If you get anything wrong (and peer-review is gonna be extra harsh), your reputation as a scientist is in tatters and you've defamed potentially billions of people. If you're right, then you've just legitimized racism in the eyes of the public, even though the difference you found is almost certainly < 5 IQ points, which is totally useless for making judgements of individuals.