Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
left means your want economic laws that are pro employee, and pro consumer
right means you want economic laws that are pro employer
centrist means you want laws that strike a balance between those two.
anything else is on another axis and all blends of all intensities of all these axes excists..
axis like :
colectivist or individualist
socialist or liberalist
nationalist or globalist
progresive or conservative
(there are more but these are important ones)
and I would be inclined that you might find stronger corelation on the progressive to conservative axis with what you state..
classic error of trying to falsely lable traits as left or right while they are not.
I am very left.. but I am also strong conservative, strong nationalist, moderate liberalist and moderate individualist
Complete suspension of disbelief shattering NONSENSE. Golem EVERYWHERE.
your reply was so incoherant I struggle to grasp wheither you mean to say you agree or disagree, can you clarify what you ment to say?
in case the point of mine went over your head let me clarify.
the world is not elegant.. it is complex.
it nor the political spectrum in it can't be divided in just two sides.
while any definition is only an aproximation of trurth.. there is a solid attemt and than there is a gross oversimplification.
left and right have well defined meaning in sociology and politicticology.
and is is a common fallacy under the dumber classes (and a tool by populists) to try to grroup anything under just those 2 lables..
it has NOTHING to do with being grounded in realism or in idealism.. thus if I take OP's post littaral the correct answer is a resounding NO
however I did get what corrolation OP tried to make, hence why I suggested he might try again using other terms that better fit..
with better defined terms.. there might be a corrolation there..
I agree. They usually have this "Im always right" energy.
leftwing. unrealistic idealism
now even looking at science you can see both sides being retarded again. creasionists ignoring natural selection and lefties ignoring a hundred years of vaccine research in the last 5 years.
so i slightly agree and slightly disagree with your statement