Originally posted by Nieve:

Makes it much more dangerous if you're targeting One single person instead of a whole group of individuals, ig?

How so? That one single person belongs to a group which i target as a whole anyway.

Why threaten anyone in the first play, I just stay in my home then play and sleep.

Police officers aren't the most hard-working people on the planet. They don't like paperwork. They don't like getting off their desks., or out of their cars.

It's easier for them to tackle one threat against one person as opposed to a threat against a group of people. Have you seen the Uvalde school incident? It is the perfect example of police incompetence, even after a whole school was in danger.

Originally posted by Nieve:

Originally posted by IcarianXT:

How so? That one single person belongs to a group which i target as a whole anyway.

Because the chances of you Actually acting on your threat goes up significantly if only one person is involved

So if i say all people of group X must be killed is ignored because i can't possible kill all of them?

I don't fight anyone and I can have fun with anything.
But why do they serious in the first place anyway.
Go watch mr bean or do something productive instead.

Originally posted by IcarianXT:

Originally posted by Nieve:

Because the chances of you Actually acting on your threat goes up significantly if only one person is involved

So if i say all people of group X must be killed is ignored because i can't possible kill all of them?

Look at it this way; if you were in charge of an international organization, a military, or a country and you said that, you would be invaded.

Originally posted by Vinz Clortho:

Originally posted by IcarianXT:

So if i say all people of group X must be killed is ignored because i can't possible kill all of them?

Look at it this way; if you were in charge of an international organization, a military, or a country and you said that, you would be invaded.

Violence people have problem in their head aren't they.

Originally posted by One Shot:

Originally posted by Vinz Clortho:

Look at it this way; if you were in charge of an international organization, a military, or a country and you said that, you would be invaded.

Violence people have problem in their head aren't they.

Unpopular opinion, but violence solves lots of problems fast.

Originally posted by IcarianXT:

Originally posted by One Shot:

Violence people have problem in their head aren't they.

Unpopular opinion, but violence solves lots of problems fast.

Then your society is a chaos with lots of violence people and you have to fight to survive.
You should move to a better area then.

Originally posted by One Shot:

Why threaten anyone in the first play, I just stay in my home then play and sleep.

Originally posted by One Shot:

Originally posted by Vinz Clortho:

Look at it this way; if you were in charge of an international organization, a military, or a country and you said that, you would be invaded.

Violence people have problem in their head aren't they.

I personally believe so.

Originally posted by IcarianXT:

I never understood why threatening whole group of people with death doesn't make it police case, but if i threaten person X which belongs to that group, then it's police case.

Can someone explain this reasoning to me?

It's an empty random threat without a specific target therefore you're likely bluffing. You don't have a target. You don't have a specific or targets, why? Why not? Because you're most likely bluffing for attention. Would you be confused? Have trouble processing? Would seem so.

ALSO! Once you specify a target the individual is within their their right to take action because you SELECTIVELY chose targeted and threatened them, it wouldn't be anonymous.

Originally posted by Doctor Go-Go:

Originally posted by IcarianXT:

I never understood why threatening whole group of people with death doesn't make it police case, but if i threaten person X which belongs to that group, then it's police case.

Can someone explain this reasoning to me?

It's an empty random threat without a specific target therefore you're likely bluffing. You don't have a target. You don't have a specific or targets, why? Why not? Because you're most likely bluffing for attention. Would you be confused? Have trouble processing? Would seem so.

ALSO! Once you specify a target the individual is within their their right to take action because you SELECTIVELY chose targeted and threatened them, it wouldn't be anonymous.

But my whole point is that it shouldnt matter if i target selected person if he is part of group which i target as a whole.

because one is nebulous and difficult (sometimes impossible) to put into concrete action, while threats and actions towards a specific person are very common.

Originally posted by IcarianXT:

Originally posted by Doctor Go-Go:

It's an empty random threat without a specific target therefore you're likely bluffing. You don't have a target. You don't have a specific or targets, why? Why not? Because you're most likely bluffing for attention. Would you be confused? Have trouble processing? Would seem so.

ALSO! Once you specify a target the individual is within their their right to take action because you SELECTIVELY chose targeted and threatened them, it wouldn't be anonymous.

But my whole point is that it shouldnt matter if i target selected person if he is part of group which i target as a whole.

Just a troll blurting out random whatever to gain attention. Investigators KNOW IT! They know what the intentions are and why a person would do it, that's why it doesn't matter.

The officials watch more than you'll ever be aware of. Pending on how serious you seem they have so many ways of monitoring you now. Not just sending an unmarked car or plain clothed person to watch and see what you do next. SO MANY ways of monitoring you when they have valid reason and or warrant. And you'll never be aware of it. Might have on file on you so they have evidence to build a case if an when necessary.

Marked vehicles and officers are sent when people need to be flagged, reminded the police are there. It's their way of waking everyone up, as in "HELLO! HEY! The police exist, they're here, we see you."

They could always go after a person for a general disturbance. Menacing threatening causing chaos and panic. Maybe they would hold the person and WAIT for person to incriminate themself.