Should Trump pardon Ghislaine Maxwell?

All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details

Final Kat 29 Jul @ 4:22am

He's openly toying with the idea of doing so. And if he does, he'd be the first and only president to pardon a convicted trafficker, which shouldn't be a title anyone would want to have.

In my opinion: hell the ♥♥♥♥ no. But what do you guys think?

UPDATE: Maxwell has been transferred to a low-security prison camp.

Last edited by Final Kat; 23 minutes ago

< >

Showing 1-15 of 90 comments

Despiser 29 Jul @ 4:27am

What does he have to gain? The optics are bad, like sex traffickers and pedos have to stick together. He may do it hoping she won't testify against him, but he always gets caught when he tries to influence witnesses and in this case, that will not go over well.

Armagon 29 Jul @ 4:28am

Sex offender protecting a sex trafficker. They all look after each other.

󠁳󠀡󠀡󠀡󠀡 󠁳 29 Jul @ 4:34am

why is this even a question lol?

Final Kat 29 Jul @ 4:35am

Originally posted by Despiser:
What does he have to gain? The optics are bad, like sex traffickers and pedos have to stick together. He may do it hoping she won't testify against him, but he always gets caught when he tries to influence witnesses and in this case, that will not go over well.

None of that's stopped him before. Politicians play chess, Trump plays tip the board over. He doesn't care much about the optics now that he's in office. He'll just lie and deny, like always. He was impeached twice and didn't give a ♥♥♥♥, so why would he start now?

Final Kat 29 Jul @ 4:37am

Originally posted by 024:
why is this even a question lol?

Give it a few hours; people will start pouring in here trying to justify it. =w=;

IcarianXT 29 Jul @ 4:37am

Doesn't matter. Even if video footage of Trump diddling a kid would surface, he won't go to prison, he is immune to all charges as a president.

Final Kat 29 Jul @ 4:38am

Originally posted by IcarianXT:
Doesn't matter. Even if video footage of Trump diddling a kid would surface, he won't go to prison, he is immune to all charges as a president.

No, he's not. He's immune to all charges because our government bends the knee to him, regardless of his status.

IcarianXT 29 Jul @ 4:45am

Originally posted by Final Kat:
Originally posted by IcarianXT:
Doesn't matter. Even if video footage of Trump diddling a kid would surface, he won't go to prison, he is immune to all charges as a president.
No, he's not. He's immune to all charges because our government bends the knee to him, regardless of his status.

US has a old policy that sitting president cannot be indicted.

Rumpelcrutchskin 29 Jul @ 4:59am

Pardoning sex trafficker who over ten years destroyed the lives of countless children and was even more vicious then Epstein. Don`t think you can go much lower then that.

*ੈ✩‧₊˚༺☆Prinny☆ 29 Jul @ 5:04am

Yes.
Unless they decide they finally know who she trafficked those kids to.
Until then? No crimes were committed.
I guess what I'm saying here is get all the 'Johns' as well as her and throw'em all under the jail.
Literally.
As in dig a hole under a jail and toss them all in it.

#10

Rumpelcrutchskin 29 Jul @ 5:05am

Originally posted by *ੈ✩‧₊˚༺☆Prinny☆:
Yes.
Unless they decide they finally know who she trafficked those kids to.
Until then? No crimes were committed.
I guess what I'm saying here is get all the 'Johns' as well as her and throw'em all under the jail.
Literally.
As in dig a hole under a jail and toss them all in it.

It`s not done to get the clients, it`s done to protect Trump.
They are buying her silence with pardon.

Last edited by Rumpelcrutchskin; 29 Jul @ 5:09am

#11

Final Kat 29 Jul @ 5:07am

Originally posted by Final Kat:
Originally posted by 024:
why is this even a question lol?
Give it a few hours; people will start pouring in here trying to justify it. =w=;

Originally posted by *ੈ✩‧₊˚༺☆Prinny☆:
Yes.
Unless they decide they finally know who she trafficked those kids to.
Until then? No crimes were committed.
I guess what I'm saying here is get all the 'Johns' as well as her and throw'em all under the jail.
Literally.
As in dig a hole under a jail and toss them all in it.

Not even an hour passed.

#12

Armagon 29 Jul @ 5:13am

Originally posted by Final Kat:
Originally posted by Final Kat:
Give it a few hours; people will start pouring in here trying to justify it. =w=;

Originally posted by *ੈ✩‧₊˚༺☆Prinny☆:
Yes.
Unless they decide they finally know who she trafficked those kids to.
Until then? No crimes were committed.
I guess what I'm saying here is get all the 'Johns' as well as her and throw'em all under the jail.
Literally.
As in dig a hole under a jail and toss them all in it.
Not even an hour passed.

Diddlers gotta protect other diddlers.

#13