Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Right now, we're playing pikmin, and we're all getting destroyed, or we're playing super smash bros and getting ko'd in life over and over
I prefer the collective struggles of the common pikmin
don't look at the earth's bulge
*notices* owo
A planet the size and mass of the earth ? Nope. An asteroid ? With enough luck maybe we can have a shape close to that. But that's not likely to happen often.
I just explained why. Why would it be a cube? Same as when you play with clay or leave dirt or matter to naturally form. Gravity won't allow it, it just naturally falls into place. When you place a level nothing is perfectly level, a cube is.
- Gravity make everything fall toward a central point.
- Mass increase the amount of force produced because of gravity by matter.
- Fluid dynamics make molten rocks and grains rearrange themselves in the most energy efficient setting.
- Erosion polish it all, litterally erasing mountains over time.
What's the most energy efficient setting for a big mass of matter, all attracted to a central point, behaving like a fluid and being polished by wind, asteriod impacts, water and other abrasive processes ?
A sphere.
Well, to be a bit more rigorous, earth isn't a perfect sphere as it tend to be a bit flatter on the pole and a bit inflated at the equator (because of centrifugal force provocked by Earth's rotation).