Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yes, corporate greed deluxe (i just sold my switch and wii)
Unless they also want to sue Nexomon, TemTem, and Coromon years after their release.
Nintendo would sue their own mom
Amiibo is a trademark that's used in connection with both figurines and video games. Nintendo probably registered it for both. Trademark distinctiveness is also a factor in how this sort of thing is determined, and Amiibo is distinct enough that just changing the M to a B is likely to be an intentional riffing of Nintendo's identity. I think Nintendo has a justified case.
What if people thought this was the game called Amiibo and thought it would be some Skylanders type game where you could use the Amiibo you already got? What if Nintendo wanted to name a game Amiibo in the future?
Some games are also marked Amiibo on the box like Twilight Princess H.D.[storage.googleapis.com].