No need to yeet that meat.

Who cares.

Originally posted by kbiz:

Who cares.

The people who had half their d*ck cut off?

If the person is over 18, they can mutilate their own gentiles to their hearts content. A child however, unless there is some strange medical necessity, shouldn't have the procedure done.

Originally posted by kbiz:

Who cares.

The victims?

Originally posted by kbiz:

Who cares.

You do realize the foreskin is the most innervated part of the penis, right?

Absolutely. But I would also ban a lot of other harmful religious things from secular life.

Originally posted by kbiz:

Who cares.

all the people who have suffered genital mutilation probably care. what a juvenile, callous thing to say.

Correct.

First they after your gooner games, then they go after your foreskin. Those aren't chicharrones you're eating....

Originally posted by Wild Child:

Those aren't chicharrones you're eating....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKqGXeX9LhQ&ab_channel=Movieclips

I weep for my Amerishart friends

You know nothing, there are actual pathologies that require circumcision for the patient well being.

On certain cases patients can't pull back their foreskins to wash their own penises and forcing can cause tearing of the foresking, infections either due to smegma build up or attempts to have intercourse with such condition do happen and compromise the patient health.

Don't hyperfocus on malpractice cases due to religious beliefs and what not, as any one might need in the future to remove a tooth the odd man will require a circumcision.

Originally posted by DarkH:

On certain cases patients can't pull back their foreskins to wash their own penises and forcing can cause tearing of the foresking, infections either due to smegma build up or attempts to have intercourse with such condition do happen and compromise the patient health.

while phimosis is horrible and i have heard it can cause immense pain during sex, it is not common and full sale performing circumcisions regardless of it is not good. it is different if someone is suffering from such a thing, but most do not.

Originally posted by DarkH:

You know nothing, there are actual pathologies that require circumcision for the patient well being.

On certain cases patients can't pull back their foreskins to wash their own penises and forcing can cause tearing of the foresking, infections either due to smegma build up or attempts to have intercourse with such condition do happen and compromise the patient health.

Don't hyperfocus on malpractice cases due to religious beliefs and what not, as any one might need in the future to remove a tooth the odd man will require a circumcision.

if you read the original post you'd realize op was referring to the non-medically-necessary kind.