Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I didn't think the king had any power
I thought i read somewhere about how empires typically last a certain amount of time, The UK and others around the world are due for a fall.
The uk already failed and lost its empire. It lost it to america.
That's why the UK is pushing to control the Internet. Heck, they literally have a police force dedicated to tracking mean words on social media.
When the guy said "The pen is mightier than the sword", I doubt he imagined a bunch of police officers crowed around a computer, looking for no no words
That's what AI is for.
they simply don't have the manpower to actually do anything themselves, and that's what this is really about.
The UK didn't lose it to America.
Colonialism lost legitimacy after World War 2.
America stepped in to facilitate the huge role of playing world policeman in a new world because the UK was exhausted after two world wars.
America doesn't have some grand empire with hundreds of colonies, any foreign intervention by the US usually costs billions.
It undermines the crown's soft power to say 'no' to all of this without having an alternative in mind, and a freshly minted king has basically 0 soft power/faith to fall back and try to form some kind of alternative out of.