Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It also used to be true. Used to be.
In ads, people used to look a **** better. I don't like the model look personally(to each their own)- and even they looked better not that long ago.
No, they won't let people on the screen anymore if they are good looking.
Blehhh.
No, NO ONE has a problem with the person in the ad. It's what American Eagle decided to add after the fact. Most of the time, the models used only talk about things related to the product in question, and NOTHING ELSE. And for a good reason. You want to keep people's eye on the ball. If they remember you more for the controversy than the product, then they ain't gonna buy the product. They could have used a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ orangutan with lipstick for all I give a ♥♥♥♥.
I wonder if it's worth the hubbub.
Not really, better just watch honest corn then this veiled eugenics propaganda.
I kinda believe you guys. So much is just put out there to get people stirred up.
For all kinds of things, the product/service may not be all that- and they gotta find ways of getting attention.
So, should I ever see the thing, I probably will roll my eyes at it.
The CURRENT version is. They removed the more controversial one. And once again, NO ONE had an issue with Sydney herself. Attractive actresses are nothing new, and quite frankly, people gotta stop acting like somehow she's anymore special than any other hot actress or model that people would give a ♥♥♥♥ about the particular model being used.
Now you keep following your programming but your innermost self which is for the most part quiet is crying out for freedom and serenity.
To gain freedom and serenity, requires work.
It is because complacency and always taking from those who give us yes even paid has created an uneven and unmanageable power dynamic where the creators and hard workers think they are meant to do it, and you guys are always asking them to do things for you.
A lot of people are scared of hard work or self reflection.
So you accepted your slave - master dynamic inherently.
Those people wouldn't have given a ♥♥♥♥ about the ad anyway. Like I said, any issues with Sydney would have been irrelevant to the ad. AE just wasn't exactly helping their case when they decided to add to the controversy. If it's just an ad with Sydney in jeans and nothing more, most people would have been happy to move along, regardless of their personal feelings about Sydney. She had also sold bathwater soap with bathwater personally from her own bath. That might have been "creepy" or "weird" enough to put people off of her, even if you discount her politics for a second. Like I said, she AIN'T special.