Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LzVIWiiHEw&ab_channel=PublicContentDatabase
And no, you can't fit a nuke into a bullet. You need a certain minimum amount of fissile material to generate a nuclear reaction.
depend also if you consider laser like rifle
If you are talking about a rifle powered by a portable nuclear reactor, there were drawings done for a laser rifle powered by a nuclear backpack. Obviously the tech wasn't there in that time and still isn't here in this time. Portable reactors that could be carried on a person's back would be a pretty big deal.
I've heard the US military is currently trying to make a combat feasible railgun that can be carried by infantry for special purposes, but it's powered by batteries and not nuclear stuff.
Looks like it's gonna be me lol.
Depleted uranium munitions don't really count. They don't produce nuclear explosions or any significant amount of radiation (though they can cause heavy metal poisoning), but uranium is extremely dense and breaks into ultra-sharp shards instead of flattening on contact like other metals. Plus, it ignites on a hit. That makes it absolutely devastating against heavy armor.