Yay communism woooo!

Originally posted by JOKER:

Under a truly global communist system, they would be expected to host immigrants in their homes, work significantly more, and have over half their possessions expropriated for redistribution to the remaining 83%.

They wouldn't, actually, because they'd be privileged members of the party. Most of the people espousing communism do so because they have more privilege than the rest of us. So they'd likely still have that privilege in a communist system.
Poor people don't talk about communism.

but we in europe ARE forced to have mass migration... (repacing the native population) and don't you dare say anything about it.

while also being slapped with 42% income tax 21% vat and often also other taxes like package tax, sugartax, co2 tax, climate adaption tax, house/car purchase tax etc etc on top too and yes wee do pay taxes (vat) over the taxes (co2 tax) we pay on the taxes (energy tax) we pay on our taxes (flat fee fuel accins)

so if you add that up goverment already takes 98% of what we pay for energy and at least 60%^for everything else..

but we STILL have a better quality of life.. than in the usa.. were they have criminals like musk running around...

free trade does need competion.. and people who add value.. those billionairs don't add.. only mooch.
thats technofedaulism.. thats not capitalism.

technofeudalists hate true free trade.

a common thing that was asked after the fall of the eastern block was would you rather see stuff in shops that you can not afford or not see stuff in shops and thus not have to be depressed over not being able to afford them.

Communism is gay

Originally posted by Morrandir:

a common thing that was asked after the fall of the eastern block was would you rather see stuff in shops that you can not afford or not see stuff in shops and thus not have to be depressed over not being able to afford them.

Most of them had neither. You couldn't see it, and you couldn't afford it if you did.

Originally posted by Prinny:

Originally posted by Morrandir:

a common thing that was asked after the fall of the eastern block was would you rather see stuff in shops that you can not afford or not see stuff in shops and thus not have to be depressed over not being able to afford them.

Most of them had neither. You couldn't see it, and you couldn't afford it if you did.

to put it more simply would you rather see something you can not afford or not see it and thus not know there is something there you can not afford but others can?

Originally posted by 271k:

Communism is gay

why are you gae?

Originally posted by JOKER:

Under a truly global communist system, they would be expected to host immigrants in their homes,

Haven't all examples of communism been ultra nationalistic?

communism = wearing a t shirt with che guevaras face on it

Originally posted by Arvaos:

Originally posted by JOKER:

Under a truly global communist system, they would be expected to host immigrants in their homes,

Haven't all examples of communism been ultra nationalistic?

Communism by definition is globalism and wouldn't allow for borders.

Originally posted by Arvaos:

Originally posted by JOKER:

Under a truly global communist system, they would be expected to host immigrants in their homes,

Haven't all examples of communism been ultra nationalistic?

I think people are confusing internationalism with open borders policies. Communism is in favor of internationalism but it is not in favor of the sort of open borders policies western wokes support.

Originally posted by Prinny:

Originally posted by Arvaos:

Haven't all examples of communism been ultra nationalistic?

Communism by definition is globalism and wouldn't allow for borders.

only if 70% of the worls population is under a communist administration.

Originally posted by Morrandir:

Originally posted by Prinny:

Communism by definition is globalism and wouldn't allow for borders.

only if 70% of the worls population is under a communist administration.

Which, if you read your Marx, is the only way communism can work.
Which basically means they want it so that you can't escape from it.

Just look at North Korea.

Originally posted by Morrandir:

Originally posted by Prinny:

Most of them had neither. You couldn't see it, and you couldn't afford it if you did.

to put it more simply would you rather see something you can not afford or not see it and thus not know there is something there you can not afford but others can?

Does something existing that you are unable to afford make a person depressed? If so, that sounds like a personal problem, and not necessarily a real problem. I see lots of things I cannot afford. I don't get depressed over it at all. I don't blame others for me not being able to afford it. And I have no desire to punish those who can just because they can.