Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
See, in the late 19th and early 20th century, nationalism was a fairly new idea in Europe. That's how the Jewish Question came to be : when we say, for example, "France for the French", does that include French Jews, who constitute a nation within a nation?
There were many answers to that, within and outside of the European Jewry. Assimilationists believed that a French Jew needed to be French first and foremost, even at the cost of his cultural heritage. Most early socialists believed in the abolition of old national divisions in favor of an international class struggle (which had generally positive implication for Jews). And of course, some ultranationalists decided that Jews should be expelled or exterminated.
Zionism (that is to say, Jewish nationalism that claims Mandatory Palestine as the Jewish homeland) was an alternative solution that was considered fringe at first, but gathered a lot of steam during and immediately after the Holocaust. Of course, it clashed with Arab nationalism, leading to 80 years of war and the situation we're at today.
Personally, I think that Israel should have been established in a mostly uninhabited area. But by 1948, there had already been mass Jewish immigration in Palestine specifically.
How it has been done, since the inception to today, on the other hand ... They should seriously had been setteld in some Brazilian forest. When you see how they developped the pack o'rocks and sand blasted by a scorching sun, one can only wonder what they could have done with a land with lot'o'trees, much much more water than in the Levant, and a nicer sun/temperatures.
They could had a Wakanda of marvels, by now, and that with no war, no displacments, no pain nor human suffering, no appartheid.
Every other major religion can do pilgrimages, and they do just that. Only them zionists wanted to inhabit the Temple itself.
I thought they paid $6m
What is your answer?