Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
They all could work, within the correct unchanging environment; as long as corruption never gets involved.
Unfortunately anything that involves humans; eventually involves some form of corruption.
Even AI.
Thus the only real way to eventually create a utopia, is to remove humans from the equation entirely at the start.
Slower = Call failure management
I can't see how any nation can move forward without entrepreneurs, business leaders, inventors etc.. why would you risk everything and work hard to simply share your hard work with other people who put nothing in.
Today we still have:
China
Cuba
Laos
North Korea
Vietnam
China and Vietnam's economic system is basically capitalist run by a communist government or a mix of everything rolled into one.
They are recognise as truly and functional communist state, with there own doctrine, depending on which school they follow.
China - Chinese Socialisme
Cuba - Marxisme / Leninisme
Laos - ?
North Korea - ?
Vietnam - Ho Chi Ming
And it's always the kids 100% made and raised in capitalism that praise a regime they never seen or experienced.