安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Who says it didn't?
"experts"
But plesiosaur could survive in both saltwater and freshwater. Why couldn't plesiosaurs on the other side of the planet, living in the ocean, survive the asteroid impact and global temperature drop, and then emerge from hiding millions of years later and travel to loch ness to get photographed by scared tourists?
They're waaay smaller than a plesiosaur.
big animal are toasted by the impact
also small crocodile exist, so small crocodile may survive just eat insect, small animal and fish until situation go better
seem it also true with small shark, they just eat small fish, sea food and wathever exist at bottom of ocean until thing go better
Body size is limited by food availability. The body of water that's in question. Lacks the amount of fish that's required. To sustain a population of large animals. It doesn't have enough to sustain a lone individual. You're asking why a hippo can't survive in the Sahara.
A Crocodile couldn't last in that lake, and they go months without eating, and marine reptiles were not sedentary. They were long distance swimmers. When there isn't enough food for the couch potato. What makes you think there's enough for the Olympic swimmer.
I don't think the ocean ever lacked fish.
Even after the asteroid impact.
The impact imparted a negligible amount of energy on the other side of the planet. I created tsunamis, sure. But fish can survive tsunamis.
Even during the ice age, if the entire ocean froze over, there would still be substantial populations of fish under the ice.
Enough for a predator to survive. Could predators have dwindled in number? Sure. But to say that all plesiosaurs went extinct and dismiss photographic evidence and sightings of plesiosaurs as insane is underestimating the sheer size of the ocean, I think.
I'm just arguing there can't be one in that lake, because there isn't enough food there for one. Drunken Scots are seeing otters, hoaxers are having a laugh, and shop owners sell trinkets. They've fully surveyed that lake from top to bottom. There are no sea monsters in that lake.