Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Part of me thinks "This needs some moderation" but another parts likes laughing at all of the oddball basement dwellers posting things which they really shouldn't be sharing with others.
The volunteers usually made decisions that made more sense than the Steam Support mods ...except when that bias crept in, then all rationality kind of went out the window.
Making the case that someone can commit white collar crime against you, so you shouldn't be reckless in the workplace shouldn't result in your precautionary statement getting deleted followed by the volunteer telling the person to waste thousands of dollars on a lawyer, many of whom on the bar association's availability list are in the pocket of big companies anyways, and then have the topic immediately locked. That is completely unreasonable.
Asking how to tell apart threatening sounding people from actual threats and drawing the analogy of king snakes and coral snakes, as a new topic in Off Topic, should not result in a deletion of your created topic and ban for, the topic (not any response) being "off topic" in the sub-forum titled "Off Topic". A volunteer did that to my record and it's been downhill since then.
That is not an unreasonable thing to ask and the only reason to delete it is if you got offended about being a snake.
Would people want me to run the moderation?
It would become very strict as it is the Steam Community Forums and so would always be thinking of the integrity of Valve.
That would have goods and bads.
Let's not forget why they are gone.
They approached Valve with their "concerns". They got invited to a private meeting at Valve HQ. Then made demands. That if not met? They would quit moderating.
This led to them being replaced.
They abused their power to benefit their friends, and silence any (and all) criticism of them. Whether that be their rules, moderation policies, or even personal opinions.
I would much prefer waiting days for someone to be banned over getting banned for saying that "cheaters are bad".
I think it pretty too late for that. The genie is out of the bottle. I would imagine a complete collapse of OT and other forums if politics get banned again. I am sure the leftists would gladly to reinstate the no politics rule so they can exercise echo chamber like in the past.