Aren't you even a little bit embarrassed that you do not understand the difference between "Epstein files" and the "Epstein list?"

Originally posted by Ulfrinn:

Aren't you even a little bit embarrassed that you do not understand the difference between "Epstein files" and the "Epstein list?"

Then he should release the files.

Before you pull the "he tried but a judge stopped him", you should read what the judge said.

It was 70 documents compared to the 100k plus that the DoJ has that aren't sealed at all. But that's probably just propaganda or something.

Yet another trdump post

Originally posted by Ulfrinn:

Aren't you even a little bit embarrassed that you do not understand the difference between "Epstein files" and the "Epstein list?"

No because I don't vote for sex offenders :)

Originally posted by Boblin the Goblin:

Originally posted by Ulfrinn:

Aren't you even a little bit embarrassed that you do not understand the difference between "Epstein files" and the "Epstein list?"

Then he should release the files.

Before you pull the "he tried but a judge stopped him", you should read what the judge said.

It was 70 documents compared to the 100k plus that the DoJ has that aren't sealed at all. But that's probably just propaganda or something.

Everyone the police have so much given a phone call too trying to get information from people are in the files. Clinton is in the files too. We already knew this because it was already made public a while ago. The files isn't the list of clients you're convinced exists somewhere. So no, someone saying Trump is in the files, is not a revelation.

Originally posted by BX:

Originally posted by Ulfrinn:

Aren't you even a little bit embarrassed that you do not understand the difference between "Epstein files" and the "Epstein list?"

No because I don't vote for sex offenders :)

I doubt you were able to vote in the US election at all.

where

Originally posted by Ulfrinn:

Originally posted by Boblin the Goblin:

Then he should release the files.

Before you pull the "he tried but a judge stopped him", you should read what the judge said.

It was 70 documents compared to the 100k plus that the DoJ has that aren't sealed at all. But that's probably just propaganda or something.

Everyone the police have so much given a phone call too trying to get information from people are in the files. Clinton is in the files too. We already knew this because it was already made public a while ago. The files isn't the list of clients you're convinced exists somewhere. So no, someone saying Trump is in the files, is not a revelation.

If the files were made public, the DoJ wouldn't be holding on to 100k more.

Oh wait, the files weren't made public.

Originally posted by Boblin the Goblin:

Originally posted by Ulfrinn:

Everyone the police have so much given a phone call too trying to get information from people are in the files. Clinton is in the files too. We already knew this because it was already made public a while ago. The files isn't the list of clients you're convinced exists somewhere. So no, someone saying Trump is in the files, is not a revelation.

If the files were made public, the DoJ wouldn't be holding on to 100k more.

Oh wait, the files weren't made public.

A completely irrelevant deflection from the obvious fact at hand. The premise this thread was started for, is false, and provenly so. Instead of trying to derail it with your tangent, start a new one.

Originally posted by Ulfrinn:

Originally posted by BX:

No because I don't vote for sex offenders :)

I doubt you were able to vote in the US election at all.

So when will Trump releasing those Epstein files?

Originally posted by Ulfrinn:

Originally posted by Boblin the Goblin:

If the files were made public, the DoJ wouldn't be holding on to 100k more.

Oh wait, the files weren't made public.

A completely irrelevant deflection from the obvious fact at hand. The premise this thread was started for, is false, and provenly so. Instead of trying to derail it with your tangent, start a new one.

It's not a tangent. Trump has been very stubborn about releasing the files. Even so much as to try and distract with the measley 70 documents of jury testimony.

He was even told he's in the files that haven't been released.

Files, list. Went to the island, didn't go to the island. I don't care who is in the files or on the list; it should be released regardless of who's on it, for the sake of public transparency and upholding the rule of law.

Originally posted by Mad Scientist:

Files, list. Went to the island, didn't go to the island. I don't care who is in the files or on the list; it should be released.

Remember, Trump stated that Bill Clinton went to the island multiple times. Then Maxwell just stated that Bill never went.

Weird huh?

I missed the part where that's my problem.

Good day. Blocked.

Originally posted by Boblin the Goblin:

Originally posted by Mad Scientist:

Files, list. Went to the island, didn't go to the island. I don't care who is in the files or on the list; it should be released.

Remember, Trump stated that Bill Clinton went to the island multiple times. Then Maxwell just stated that Bill never went.

Weird huh?

Especially when running on it, should be delivered when literally possible and being the current leader. Anyone and everyone involved in the "loli express", the happenings on the island, and child/sex trafficking should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, no matter who's in the files or on the list. Supposedly everything on the island was recorded too, so whoever did wrong needs the rule of law to come along, no letting people go because they're celebrities or politicians.