Vac / Anticheat: Opinions
How u Girl / Guys think the AC is rn??
I think its at the worst state ever. U get atleast every 2 rounds a players thats minimal wh / aim helper.
then 10 out of 30 round i got the feeling some players have a helping radar ;)
Cheack the Leaderboards of csstats.gg and cheack these players Demos etc.
And against the skinfarming Bot accounts they do nothing against too....:csgoanarchist:
< >
Showing 1-4 of 4 comments
Its a good anti cheat maybe even the best anti cheat
Don 25 Jul @ 3:43pm 
I've played a lot of matches recently and checked CSStats.gg.The last VAC ban was on June 8th, 2025. I'm certain I've played both with and against wallhackers since then. Makes me wonder how long VAC takes to actually catch up.
MAXE 25 Jul @ 3:49pm 
Originally posted by ✪ 𝐇𝐚𝐤𝐨:
I've played a lot of matches recently and checked CSStats.gg.The last VAC ban was on June 8th, 2025. I'm certain I've played both with and against wallhackers since then. Makes me wonder how long VAC takes to actually catch up.

In my opinion, then vac seems pointless in combat cheating, Vacnet cannot stand alone in this fight .. Valve will need better account management and protect it with something more personal, like etc. the mitid digital id Denmarks citizens are using for privat company´s and banking and goverment stuff .. Eurolotto even got it ...

If valve get that type of account management protection, then Valve could be really sure about that every user is a human and Valve would know that if that person is banned, then it is for good or untill valve decide to unban the individual !

Vacnet as a standalone protection against cheating and other unwanted users, is not enough, we need better account management and more personal accounts.. Digital id is the way to do it !

Digital id allso prevent sale of stolen accounts & other sales on webpages like Ebay
Last edited by MAXE; 25 Jul @ 3:55pm
This comment is awaiting analysis by our automated content check system. It will be temporarily hidden until we verify that it does not contain harmful content (e.g. links to websites that attempt to steal information).
< >
Showing 1-4 of 4 comments
Per page: 1530 50