Originally posted by Grandpa Canuck:

May I ask how is my entry oversized? To me it fits the size requirements, there is no other items from a DLC .

Check it using SE toolbox. Almost every ship that got a DQ for size exceeded the limit due to a camera block. I've already mentioned this.

I'll be contacting the winners soon.

aronusiek: 1st
MACH Velocity: 2nd
Samerrie: 3rd

aronusiek: 48.4
MACH Velocity: 47
Samerrie: 39
Rv2pc3d: 37
Torch Bug MK 1 L: 36.8

Surtur: size DQ
Dracco0085: size DQ
Bron_Helstrom: cockpit requirement
Grandpa Canuck: size DQ

The size DQs seemed to be a result of forgetting a camera was a block and then exceeding that dimension because it would appear to be flat. I was getting confused myself about some of the ships being over the limit in SE toolbox but seemingly not ingame.

Results
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/592151295167823902/596082744543412245/contesst_56.png

Cute!

Originally posted by Smiley Soldier:

https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1784641078 Its probably a bit bigger than the rest i put a lot of time into it. just finished the workshop side of things today. Also Don't know how many blocks and i don't know how to find out i hope its not ever the limit.

You can check it in the description for the blueprint ingame IIRC and it will show up when you paste it in before you left click. It's worth the time to make sure you don't get a DQ.

Also gatling turrets aren't one of the approved weapons. I clarified it in the thread.

You also appear to be over the weapon limit regardless.

The ship is meant to be for space, I don't see this working there.

Originally posted by Copycat80:

S20 arrow
https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1783155131 It is a World, but I cant upload any other way, the fighter in the world is the Blueprint.

I'll make an exception for this one if you can't get it to work by the 4th.

Here's some feedback from MACH Velocity (normally entrants wouldn't be allowed to judge but considering the experimental nature of this one and the need for judges, I made an exception. There were no prizes other than feedback for this contest and MACH gave some very good feedback).

(I hope I don't butcher the formatting)

MACH Velocity:

Here are my reviews of the four other bases. I've have done my best to not be biased


Mars Greenhouse by Hulltech
What went well:
• Fantastic detailing on the tractor and inside of the tractor hangar, particularly like the spinning rotor on the front of the tractor and the use of conveyors as exhaust pipes
• Captures very well the feeling of a lone farm miles from civilization
• Nice detail with the lamps over the plants to give the impression of providing artificial light to help them grow
• Good use of voxel tool to create Earth like soil within the greenhouse
• Like the use of tanks spread around to add more detail
Even better if:
• Would be nice to have the greenhouse connected to the crew quarters so you didn’t have to go outside in a spacesuit to go between them
• The detailing on the tractor and hangar was very good, it would have been nice to see the same level of detailing in the crew quarters and greenhouse
Aesthetic score = 4/10
Features score = 5/10


Mars Base - Planetary Agricultural Outpost by alexander_pelletier
What went well:
• Really like the way that little cubicles have been provided for each player with a bed and locker but then arranged in a way to give them all privacy, very clever
• Very clear sign posting makes getting around very easy
• Nice walkways between the different modules
• Fun vehicles to drive around in makes the base feel more alive, clever little rover door on the back
• Good use of LCD’s to create a maps of the base
• Like the detailing of the interior, with good use of blocks to break up flat surfaces
• I like the big windows giving panaramas of the Martian surface outside
Even better if:
• Interior of the rovers could have more detailing like the interior of the base
• More colouring of the base to break up the white walls
• Better if the exterior walls were as nicely detailed as the interior
Aesthetic score = 6/10
Features score = 6/10


Catherson; the underground plantation by Copycat80
What went well:
• Absolutely incredible underground city. The level of detail is absolutely astonishing!
• The building of modules and walkways into the voxels to create an intricate cave system is incredibly well done
• The detail that has gone into making it feel like a proper little city is amazing, from a supermarket with stacked shelves and cashier’s desk. To a nuclear reactor with a projector used to give the appearance of water
• Lots of mods used really well, in particularly I like the lighting used on the modules and how they loom out of the darkness of the cave
• I also like the contrast achieved between the living quarters with sleek elegant lines and the more functional areas with blocky modular construction and nice little details like pipes and cameras
• One of my favourite space engineer worlds!
Even better if:
• It is quite confusing to find your way around
• It seems like the hangars to the exterior are unfinished?
Aesthetic score = 9/10
Features score = 9/10

Titan Agricultural outpost by Tomas_SVK
What went well:
• Another absolutely amazing build
• Love the design of the interconnecting modules, really looks like a prefabricated structure that could have been developed by NASA
• Excellent use of voxel tools and plant models to create unique environments in each greenhouse
• Details like the cargo ship give the whole base an alive and operational feel
• Really good build and I enjoyed exploring it
Even better if:
• More signage to help get around would be helpful
• There seem to be a lot of interior rooms which are empty
Aesthetic score = 8/10
Features score = 7/10