It just comes down to how well you are at resisting arguments. I can’t tell you how many times someone in left 4 dead or CS GO has told me to kill myself, simply because I couldn’t go what they wanted in a video game. I could have told them to kill themselves like they told me, but I didn’t it’s just not worth it. After all you don’t know when you will die, so life is just way too short to be mad or sad. So to answer your question “how does someone become kind” all you have to do is stop taking life seriously, because it’s all just one big game and games are meant to be fun

That's actually a very valid response thanks for sharing!

I don't really know
Being kind is just nice
Be kind to people, people will be kind to you

''Kind isn't genuine. Kind isn't over rated. So this brings up how does someone become kind?''

- I don't think you know what genuine really means. By adding genuine in to this context, you are implying that people by nature aren't genuine, which means everybody in the world by a standard are liars, lying to everybody about everything and everyone, and never truly mean anything.

''Kind is subjective to each individual I'm sure of that''

-Kindness and evil does not exist (I can't 1000% confirm this though, but try to prove me wrong). You can't smell kindness, or touch evil. They are created by us as a social construct to serve its purpose of definition and recognition of the certain behaviours they represent.

- Whether something is kind or evil is, obviously, subjective. How each individual defines it depends on moral standards and values, as well as partially, priorities, and empathic and sympathic development. You could go as far as to say it is connected to intelligence to a certain degree, considering that many people may not often know what's best for them, and thus reference a kind action as something malevolent (because the action did not emotionally please them), although you may argue this comes from strong sympathy, in which case i wouldn't really refute you either.

I'd like to add slightly further on what Sasuke said:

- That it comes down to how well you are at resisting arguments is wrong. Resisting arguments has more to do with you not letting yourself be emotionally affected by critique. You then explain in your scenario ad hominems, which has nothing to do with arguments, but personal attacks, which goes back to having to do with how much you let yourself be emotionally affected by things.

- You 'resisting' to answer back in ad hominem is not kindness. That is being passive. If you're not doing anything, then you're not being kind nor evil. You just are. It implies that you say ''saying nothing in this situation is better than anything'', which perhaps is true, but that is a logical fallacy when applied to it being suggested as kind.

Originally posted by Le'Dawn:

''Kind isn't genuine. Kind isn't over rated. So this brings up how does someone become kind?''

- I don't think you know what genuine really means. By adding genuine in to this context, you are implying that people by nature aren't genuine, which means everybody in the world by a standard are liars, lying to everybody about everything and everyone, and never truly mean anything.

''Kind is subjective to each individual I'm sure of that''

-Kindness and evil does not exist (I can't 1000% confirm this though, but try to prove me wrong). You can't smell kindness, or touch evil. They are created by us as a social construct to serve its purpose of definition and recognition of the certain behaviours they represent.

- Whether something is kind or evil is, obviously, subjective. How each individual defines it depends on moral standards and values, as well as partially, priorities, and empathic and sympathic development. You could go as far as to say it is connected to intelligence to a certain degree, considering that many people may not often know what's best for them, and thus reference a kind action as something malevolent (because the action did not emotionally please them), although you may argue this comes from strong sympathy, in which case i wouldn't really refute you either.

I'd like to add slightly further on what Sasuke said:

- That it comes down to how well you are at resisting arguments is wrong. Resisting arguments has more to do with you not letting yourself be emotionally affected by critique. You then explain in your scenario ad hominems, which has nothing to do with arguments, but personal attacks, which goes back to having to do with how much you let yourself be emotionally affected by things.

- You 'resisting' to answer back in ad hominem is not kindness. That is being passive. If you're not doing anything, then you're not being kind nor evil. You just are. It implies that you say ''saying nothing in this situation is better than anything'', which perhaps is true, but that is a logical fallacy when applied to it being suggested as kind.

That’s the funny thing about life, there are no right or wrong answers. Something someone may believe in is right in their eyes but wrong to someone else. In this situation the word “kind” can mean many things, like helping a friend or donating to charity, but to someone else it might be something morbid. it’s a lot like an image, the left might look very different from the right, it all just depends on what angle you’re looking at in from.

I'll put this very simple for you.

''I'm sad''
''Why?''
''I have no sugar''
''Here, have some''
''Yay, thank you!''

This scenario tells almost everything. The right thing would be to deny them of sugar and explain how they're better with a smaller amount, which i stated earlier can be taken out by the addicted person as aggression depending on how emotionally affected they are by it. It also shows you how deluded it can be. Hurray, i gave sugar, i made someone happy. I'm helping, right?

I know what you truly mean, and i understand what you're saying. It does not specifically tie to the scenario i gave you, however this is more about how you apply it, if not, then you would be saying nothing matters because everything is but a perception.

Thus, i agree with you, but i want you to understand specifically what i am saying to you right now. It is important to understand why even something that comes from kind intents, can be hurtful.

There may not be a right or wrong, but there is a better and worse. Giving the sugar is, in my opinion, much worse you see. Hence, someone giving another person sugar would in my opinion be deluded if they believe it was kind. You can still apply your same argument, but it will not change the fact that is unhealthy regardless.

That is true but most of the anime community believes there is right and wrong. Kind isn't genuine since it's not in human nature. Humans are born neutral but in a world filled with hatred it's easy to attract and gain hatred. Sure, the world actually is improving day by day but the hatred is easier to slump into.

Originally posted by Qxron:

That is true but most of the anime community believes there is right and wrong. Kind isn't genuine since it's not in human nature. Humans are born neutral but in a world filled with hatred it's easy to attract and gain hatred. Sure, the world actually is improving day by day but the hatred is easier to slump into.

- Please look up what genuity actually is... To be genuine is to be sincere and truly mean something. Kindness and evil is completely irrelevant to it.
- Humans are not born neutral. What even would be neutral? Biologically speaking, we are everything BUT neutral. I don't want to get in to this because there's so much, but prime instincts is an easy example of how we are not neutral. We are also, by nature, competitive, which means we are not fair, which is not neutral.

Originally posted by Le'Dawn:

I'll put this very simple for you.

''I'm sad''
''Why?''
''I have no sugar''
''Here, have some''
''Yay, thank you!''

This scenario tells almost everything. The right thing would be to deny them of sugar and explain how they're better with a smaller amount, which i stated earlier can be taken out by the addicted person as aggression depending on how emotionally affected they are by it. It also shows you how deluded it can be. Hurray, i gave sugar, i made someone happy. I'm helping, right?

I know what you truly mean, and i understand what you're saying. It does not specifically tie to the scenario i gave you, however this is more about how you apply it, if not, then you would be saying nothing matters because everything is but a perception.

Thus, i agree with you, but i want you to understand specifically what i am saying to you right now. It is important to understand why even something that comes from kind intents, can be hurtful.

There may not be a right or wrong, but there is a better and worse. Giving the sugar is, in my opinion, much worse you see. Hence, someone giving another person sugar would in my opinion be deluded if they believe it was kind. You can still apply your same argument, but it will not change the fact that is unhealthy regardless.

Why would you not give him sugar? If you have something that you've developed or are skilled in you're kind of obligated to give tips to those wanting to get better. I should probably rephrase since I feel like that was stated wrong. Here it goes, you should help that person get his own sugar. In this scenario it would be best to help him work and get sugar or to give him some sugar and help him reproduce that sugar. Just like if it was a video on growing hair. If that person has results you'll want to see his/her results and get them you'll want to learn how they did it even if they're not sure themselves.

I understand what you’re saying, im just giving my thoughts.

Originally posted by Qxron:

Originally posted by Le'Dawn:

I'll put this very simple for you.

''I'm sad''
''Why?''
''I have no sugar''
''Here, have some''
''Yay, thank you!''

This scenario tells almost everything. The right thing would be to deny them of sugar and explain how they're better with a smaller amount, which i stated earlier can be taken out by the addicted person as aggression depending on how emotionally affected they are by it. It also shows you how deluded it can be. Hurray, i gave sugar, i made someone happy. I'm helping, right?

I know what you truly mean, and i understand what you're saying. It does not specifically tie to the scenario i gave you, however this is more about how you apply it, if not, then you would be saying nothing matters because everything is but a perception.

Thus, i agree with you, but i want you to understand specifically what i am saying to you right now. It is important to understand why even something that comes from kind intents, can be hurtful.

There may not be a right or wrong, but there is a better and worse. Giving the sugar is, in my opinion, much worse you see. Hence, someone giving another person sugar would in my opinion be deluded if they believe it was kind. You can still apply your same argument, but it will not change the fact that is unhealthy regardless.

Why would you not give him sugar? If you have something that you've developed or are skilled in you're kind of obligated to give tips to those wanting to get better. I should probably rephrase since I feel like that was stated wrong. Here it goes, you should help that person get his own sugar. In this scenario it would be best to help him work and get sugar or to give him some sugar and help him reproduce that sugar. Just like if it was a video on growing hair. If that person has results you'll want to see his/her results and get them you'll want to learn how they did it even if they're not sure themselves.

You're making up a hidden meaning. I am talking about literal sugar.

Nope, at the beginning I was meaning literal sugar at the end changed the topic from sugar to someone with success that you want to get. They're both discussing someone wanting something and desiring to get the tips needed to succeed.

Originally posted by Qxron:

Nope, at the beginning I was meaning literal sugar at the end changed the topic from sugar to someone with success that you want to get. They're both discussing someone wanting something and desiring to get the tips needed to succeed.

If you meant literal sugar at the beginning, then your perception is destructive and extremely dangerous to society. That perception relies on people feeding themselves on addicted desire by a product harmful for them in the first place.

How am I extremely dangerous though? In the example you have a choice to help someone or tell them to be ok with what they have. Why not help them feel better about themselves by giving them what they asked for? I understand what you mean though. Only in some instances should you tell them to be okay with what they have. Some require help.

Originally posted by Qxron:

How am I extremely dangerous though? In the example you have a choice to help someone or tell them to be ok with what they have. Why not help them feel better about themselves by giving them what they asked for? I understand what you mean though. Only in some instances should you tell them to be okay with what they have. Some require help.

- Never said YOU were dangerous. Read again

- No... How do you not see this? Turn sugar in to drugs since apparently you did not know sugar was bad. Is giving someone drugs, helping them? Please, please read everything i've said since the beginning.