The user has a ban reason on their actual profile, like Cyanide has stated.

The ban seems to have occurred in April of 2012, and has nothing mentioned beyond that reason given. The account also has never filed an appeal and seems to now be abandoned.

https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/groups/tf2outpost/discussions/0/618453594763138555/

The bat was a real item,it was kept stock,it should have been looked into by admins instead of not even giving a valid reason on any of them, I feel like if an admin does remove a trade they should give a reason

Originally posted by Currier Bell:

The user has a ban reason on their actual profile, like Cyanide has stated.

The ban seems to have occurred in April of 2012, and has nothing mentioned beyond that reason given. The account also has never filed an appeal and seems to now be abandoned.

I'm not talking about unbanning him,I'm asking why these trades were removed without a reason,the other one is legit and dosnt even have a stock item in it,he didn't even type anything for that. He shouldn't really have been banned in the first place, I do understand why outpost removes the stock bat because of scam reasons,A trade for it did finally go through (he most likely explained it to an admin) But the trades were all removed without a valid reason listed,then the user was permanentaly banned by the same admin because of trying to sell a real item with a price,after a successful trade had been completed with it

I typed that response before I read that reply by the way,it loaded after I clicked post
I can see why he was banned,but the unlisted reasons

The reason is there when you view his profile and usually when a user is perma banned all their trades are closed, it's simple as that.

Not suspended for no reason,just closed,He still need to put a reason on the trades suspended before the ban

The ban took place almost 2 years ago and the moderator that did the banning is no longer on the staff. Many things have been learned from since the time this ban took place, and our current and future staff have better procedures to make sure confusing bans like this do not happen.

I'm not going to say that the ban was handled in the best possible way, but this was one instance that happened years ago and is not in any way indicative of our current banning system.

Originally posted by Currier Bell:

The ban took place almost 2 years ago and the moderator that did the banning is no longer on the staff. Many things have been learned from since the time this ban took place, and our current and future staff have better procedures to make sure confusing bans like this do not happen.

I'm not going to say that the ban was handled in the best possible way, but this was one instance that happened years ago and is not in any way indicative of our current banning system.

I was mainly referencing the incompetence of the admin

Originally posted by Freezerburn:

Originally posted by Currier Bell:

The ban took place almost 2 years ago and the moderator that did the banning is no longer on the staff. Many things have been learned from since the time this ban took place, and our current and future staff have better procedures to make sure confusing bans like this do not happen.

I'm not going to say that the ban was handled in the best possible way, but this was one instance that happened years ago and is not in any way indicative of our current banning system.

I was mainly referencing the incompetence of the admin

Go hunt for 2 yo problems elsewhere, we have enough problems as it is with the users constantly abusing other users & our site.

If "Old Men :3" wants to appeal their ban, they are free to. We do not discuss bans with third-parties.