STEAM GROUP
TF2 Outpost by Fanbyte
Membership by invitation only
STEAM GROUP
TF2 Outpost by Fanbyte
3,860
IN-GAME
28,950
ONLINE
Founded
7 August, 2011
Language
English
Shinyform 12 Dec, 2013 @ 12:59pm
Consideration for changing the wording of the rules for relisting.
My trade was hidden for being a relist, and even after talking to a moderator about my situation, I still feel as though based off of what the rules say what I did was perfectly fine. What I did was had 1:1 trades in unusuals, then one 2 or 3:1 trade with all the unusuals I have (this trade was hidden). The rules would suggest that the two trades had different purposes, and I definitely did not have an excessive amount of them as the other guide line suggests. Yet, I still got taken down as a relist. I would personally recommend either changing the strictness of the rule (what I prefer, as I really think 2 or 3:1 and then 1:1 trades are actually different), or change the wording of the rule itself. Thanks for reading.
< >
Showing 1-3 of 3 comments
Currier Bell 12 Dec, 2013 @ 2:20pm 
I'd have to disagree with you in seeing those trades as different. They all had the same purpose of trading your unusuals for others. Regardless of how many you were trading at once, these trades all served the same purpose, just with different quantities.

The wording of the relist rule is the way it is because it needs to be fairly general instead of pointing out specific things not to do. If we went that route, any time someone found a specific instance that wasn't covered (1:1 different than 2:1, 9 trades up for each class but just buying craft hats) they would try to use it as a loophole.

NaCl-y Pancake 12 Dec, 2013 @ 2:27pm 
They can't re-word things to make them understandable for people without common sense.
LiddoJunior 12 Dec, 2013 @ 2:34pm 
One item, one trade. One purpose, one trade. Knowing that and you won't ever have any trades closed for relisting. :)
< >
Showing 1-3 of 3 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: 12 Dec, 2013 @ 12:59pm
Posts: 3